Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37789012›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2023

The effect of image fractal properties and its interaction with visual discomfort on gait kinematics.

D Burtan, J F Burn, B Spehar, U Leonards

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

D BurtanSchool of Psychological Science, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK. daria.burtan@bristol.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2881-9005
J F BurnQueen's School of Engineering, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
B SpeharSchool of Psychology, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia. b.spehar@unsw.edu.au.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3344-7162
U LeonardsSchool of Psychological Science, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK. ute.leonards@bristol.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6143-7466

Funding

Wellcome TrustWellcome Trust WT089367AIA
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Exposure to images of urban environments affords higher cognitive processing demands than exposure to images of nature scenes; an effect potentially related to differences in low-level image statistics such as fractals. The aim of the current study was to investigate whether the fractal dimensions of an abstract scene affect cognitive processing demands, using gait kinematics as a measure of cognitive demand. Participants (n = 40) were asked to walk towards different types of synthetic images which were parametrically varied in their fractal dimensions. At the end of each walk, participants rated each image for its visual discomfort (n = 20) or for its likability (n = 20) as potential confounding factors. Fractal dimensions were predictors of walking speed. Moreover, the interaction between fractal dimensions and subjective visual discomfort but not liking predicted velocity. Overall, these data suggest that fractal dimensions indeed contribute to environmentally induced cognitive processing demands.

Indexed as

FractalsGaitBiomechanical PhenomenaHumansWalkingWalking Speed

Identifiers

PMID37789012
PMCPMC10547763

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.