Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37788987›Full record

ArticleNature communications2023

The evolution of same-sex sexual behaviour in mammals.

José M Gómez, A Gónzalez-Megías, M Verdú

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Rethinking same-sex sexual behavior: From sensory error to social function.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Drivers of same-sex sexual behaviour.Nature ecology & evolution · 2026
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Queer Black voices in conservation.Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology · 2024
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

José M GómezDpto de Ecología Funcional y Evolutiva, Estación Experimental de Zonas Áridas (EEZA-CSIC), Carretera de Sacramento s/n, La Cañada de San Urbano, 0-4120, Almería, Spain. jmgreyes@eeza.csic.es.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2487-4664
A Gónzalez-MegíasResearch Unit Modeling Nature (MNat), Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad de Granada, Granada, Spain. adelagm@ugr.es.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2292-9334
M VerdúCentro de Investigaciones sobre Desertificación (CSIC-UV-GV), Crta Moncada-Náquera km 4.5, 46113 Moncada, Valencia, Spain. miguel.verdu@ext.uv.es.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9778-7692

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Same-sex sexual behaviour has attracted the attention of many scientists working in disparate areas, from sociology and psychology to behavioural and evolutionary biology. Since it does not contribute directly to reproduction, same-sex sexual behaviour is considered an evolutionary conundrum. Here, using phylogenetic analyses, we explore the evolution of same-sex sexual behaviour in mammals. According to currently available data, this behaviour is not randomly distributed across mammal lineages, but tends to be particularly prevalent in some clades, especially primates. Ancestral reconstruction suggests that same-sex sexual behaviour may have evolved multiple times, with its appearance being a recent phenomenon in most mammalian lineages. Our phylogenetically informed analyses testing for associations between same-sex sexual behaviour and other species characteristics suggest that it may play an adaptive role in maintaining social relationships and mitigating conflict.

Indexed as

Biological EvolutionSexual Behavior, AnimalAnimalsMammalsPhylogenyPrimates

Identifiers

PMID37788987
PMCPMC10547684

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.