ArticleProtein science : a publication of the Protein Society2023
Retracing the evolution of a modern periplasmic binding protein.
Article in Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Bioinformatics and modelling studies of FhuD, the periplasmic siderophore binding protein from the plant pathogen Erwinia amylovora.PloS one · 2025Article
- Retracing the evolution of a modern periplasmic binding protein.Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Investigating the evolution of structural features in modern multidomain proteins helps to understand their immense diversity and functional versatility. The class of periplasmic binding proteins (PBPs) offers an opportunity to interrogate one of the main processes driving diversification: the duplication and fusion of protein sequences to generate new architectures. The symmetry of their two-lobed topology, their mechanism of binding, and the organization of their operon structure led to the hypothesis that PBPs arose through a duplication and fusion event of a single common ancestor. To investigate this claim, we set out to reverse the evolutionary process and recreate the structural equivalent of a single-lobed progenitor using ribose-binding protein (RBP) as our model. We found that this modern PBP can be deconstructed into its lobes, producing two proteins that represent possible progenitor halves. The isolated halves of RBP are well folded and monomeric proteins, albeit with a lower thermostability, and do not retain the original binding function. However, the two entities readily form a heterodimer in vitro and in-cell. The x-ray structure of the heterodimer closely resembles the parental protein. Moreover, the binding function is fully regained upon formation of the heterodimer with a ligand affinity similar to that observed in the modern RBP. This highlights how a duplication event could have given rise to a stable and functional PBP-like fold and provides insights into how more complex functional structures can evolve from simpler molecular components.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.