Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37788921›Full record

ArticleBMJ military health2025

How long is Long-COVID? Symptomatic improvement between 12 and 18 months in a prospective cohort study.

Robert M Barker-Davies, O O'Sullivan, D A Holdsworth, P Ladlow, A Houston, R Chamley, A Greenhalgh, E D Nicol, A N Bennett

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ military health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. A Step Forward in Long COVID Research: Validating the Post-COVID Cognitive Impairment Scale.European journal of investigation in health, psychology and education · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Robert M Barker-DaviesAcademic Department of Military Rehabilitation, Defence Medical Rehabilitation Centre, Loughborough, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2893-1299
O O'SullivanAcademic Department of Military Rehabilitation, Defence Medical Rehabilitation Centre, Loughborough, UK.
D A HoldsworthAcademic Department of Military Medicine, Royal Centre for Defence Medicine, Birmingham, UK.
P LadlowAcademic Department of Military Rehabilitation, Defence Medical Rehabilitation Centre, Loughborough, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9891-9714
A HoustonAcademic Department of Military Rehabilitation, Defence Medical Rehabilitation Centre, Loughborough, UK.
R ChamleyAcademic Department of Military Medicine, Royal Centre for Defence Medicine, Birmingham, UK.
A GreenhalghAcademic Department of Military Rehabilitation, Defence Medical Rehabilitation Centre, Loughborough, UK.
E D NicolDepartment of Cardiology, Royal Brompton Hospital, Birmingham, UK.
A N BennettAcademic Department of Military Rehabilitation, Defence Medical Rehabilitation Centre, Loughborough, UK alexander.n.bennett@btinternet.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionCOVID-19 infection can precede, in a proportion of patients, a prolonged syndrome including fatigue, exercise intolerance, mood and cognitive problems. This study aimed to describe the profile of fatigue-related, exercise-related, mood-related and cognitive-related outcomes in a COVID-19-exposed group compared with controls.

methods113 serving UK Armed Forces participants were followed up at 5, 12 (n=88) and 18 months (n=70) following COVID-19. At 18 months, 56 were in the COVID-19-exposed group with 14 matched controls. Exposed participants included hospitalised (n=25) and community (n=31) managed participants. 43 described at least one of the six most frequent symptoms at 5 months: fatigue, shortness of breath, chest pain, joint pain, exercise intolerance and anosmia. Participants completed a symptom checklist, patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs), the National Institute for Health cognitive battery and a 6-minute walk test (6MWT). PROMs included the Fatigue Assessment Scale (FAS), Generalised Anxiety Disorder-7 (GAD-7), Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) and Patient Checklist-5 (PCL-5) for post-traumatic stress.

resultsAt 5 and 12 months, exposed participants presented with higher PHQ-9, PCL-5 and FAS scores than controls (ES (effect size) ≥0.25, p≤0.04). By 12 months, GAD-7 was not significantly different to controls (ES <0.13, p=0.292). Remaining PROMs lost significant difference by 18 months (ES ≤0.11, p≥0.28). No significant differences in the cognitive scales were observed at any time point (F=1.96, p=0.167). At 5 and 12 months, exposed participants recorded significantly lower distances on the 6MWT (η

conclusionsThis prospective cohort-controlled study observed adverse outcomes in depression, post-traumatic stress, fatigue and submaximal exercise performance up to 12 months but improved by 18-month follow-up, in participants exposed to COVID-19 compared with a matched control group.

Indexed as

COVID-19Military PersonnelAdultCohort StudiesFatigueFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedProspective StudiesTime FactorsUnited KingdomCOVID-19REHABILITATION MEDICINESPORTS MEDICINE

Identifiers

PMID37788921
PMCPMC12015064

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.