ArticleAmerican journal of obstetrics and gynecology2024
International expert consensus on the surgical anatomic classification of radical hysterectomies.
Article in American journal of obstetrics and gynecology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Quantifying the impact of bladder complications following gynecological cancer treatment: systematic review and meta-regression.Journal of gynecologic oncology · 2025Pooled it
- ASO Author Reflections: Standardized and Reproducible Surgical Steps of Nerve-Sparing Radical Hysterectomy.Annals of surgical oncology · 2026Article
- Surgical outcomes according to the degree of parametrial dissection with hysterectomy for deep endometriosis.Facts, views & vision in ObGyn · 2026Article
- Adjuvant Treatment for Surgically-Treated Cervical Cancer Patients: A Comprehensive Review.Cancers · 2025Review
- Article
- Mapping the immunological landscape and emerging immunotherapeutic strategies in cervical cancer: a comprehensive review.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Review
- The relationship between psychological flexibility and health locus of control in patients after total hysterectomy: a latent class analysis.Frontiers in psychology · 2025Article
- The Clinical Characteristics and Treatment Outcomes of Mesonephric Tumours of the Uterine Cervix: A Systematic Review and Proposal of Embryologically-Oriented Surgical Resection.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Review
- Endometrial Intraepithelial Neoplasia, Concurrent Endometrial Cancer and Risk for Pelvic Sentinel Node Metastases.Cancers · 2024Article
- A Modified Nerve Preservation Technique in Radical Hysterectomy: Three-Dimensional Precise Dissection of Paracolpium.Surgery journal (New York, N.Y.) · 2024Article
- Indocyanine Green for Assessment of Ureteral Vascularity Can Reduce the Rate of Ureteral Complications in Patients Undergoing Extended Hysterectomy.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe anatomic descriptions and extents of radical hysterectomy often vary across the literature and operative reports worldwide. The same nomenclature is often used to describe varying procedures, and different nomenclature is often used to describe the same procedure despite the availability of guideline and classification systems. This makes it difficult to interpret retrospective surgical reports, analyze surgical databases, understand technique descriptions, and interpret the findings of surgical studies.
objectiveIn collaboration with international experts in gynecologic oncology, the purpose of this study was to establish a consensus in defining and interpreting the 2017 updated Querleu-Morrow classification of radical hysterectomies. STUDY
designThe anatomic templates of type A, B, and C radical hysterectomy were documented through a set of 13 images taken at the time of cadaver dissection. An online survey related to radical hysterectomy nomenclature and definitions or descriptions of the associated procedures was circulated among international experts in radical hysterectomy. A 3-step modified Delphi method was used to establish consensus. Image legends were amended according to the experts' responses and then redistributed as part of a second round of the survey. Consensus was defined by a yes response to a question concerning a specific image. Anyone who responded no to a question was welcome to comment and provide justification. A final set of images and legends were compiled to anatomically illustrate and define or describe a lateral, ventral, and dorsal excision of the tissues surrounding the cervix.
resultsIn total, there were 13 questions to review, and 29 experts completed the whole process. Final consensus exceeded 90% for all questions except 1 (86%). Questions with relatively lower consensus rates concerned the definitions of types A and B2 radical hysterectomy, which were the main innovations of the 2017 updated version of the 2008 Querleu-Morrow classification. Questions with the highest consensus rates concerned the definitions of types B1 and C, which are the most frequently performed radical hysterectomies.
conclusionThe 2017 version of the Querleu-Morrow classification proved to be a robust tool for defining and describing the extent of radical hysterectomies with a high level of consensus among international experts in gynecologic oncology. Knowledge and implementation of the exact definitions of hysterectomy radicality are imperative in clinical practice and clinical research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.