Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37788601›Full record

ReviewJournal of addiction medicine

Evidence on Buprenorphine Dose Limits: A Review.

Lucinda A Grande, Dave Cundiff, Mark K Greenwald, MaryAnne Murray, Tricia E Wright, Stephen A Martin

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of addiction medicine. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 39 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
39citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
19.1field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

39 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 66 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Multi-ancestry genome-wide association meta-analysis of buprenorphine treatment response.Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Perioperative Management of Patients on Buprenorphine.Current pain and headache reports · 2026
    Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. [Clinical pharmacology of opioid analgesics].Schmerz (Berlin, Germany) · 2025
    Review
  18. Emergency Department-Based Medication for Opioid Use Disorder: A 5-Year Experience.Journal of the American College of Emergency Physicians open · 2025
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Lucinda A GrandeFrom the Pioneer Family Practice, Lacey, and University of Washington School of Medicine Department of Family Medicine, Seattle, WA (LAG); Smart Moves Integrated Health Services, Ilwaco, WA (DC, MM); Wayne State University, Detroit, MI (MKG); University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA (TEW); and Boulder Care, Portland, OR and UMass Chan Medical School, Worcester, MA (SAM).
Dave Cundiff
Mark K Greenwald
MaryAnne Murray
Tricia E Wright
Stephen A Martin
Strateji Araşdırmalar Mərkəzi · AZWayne State University · USMuseum of Art and Design Hamburg · DEUniversity of California, San Francisco · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesAs overdose deaths from fentanyl continue to increase, optimizing use of medications for opioid use disorder has become increasingly important. Buprenorphine is a highly effective medication for reducing the risk of overdose death, but only if a patient remains in treatment. Shared decision making between prescribers and patients is important to establish a dose that meets each patient's treatment needs. However, patients frequently face a dose limit of 16 or 24 mg/d based on dosing guidelines on the Food and Drug Administration's package label.

methodsThis review discusses patient-centered goals and clinical criteria for determining dose adequacy, reviews the history of buprenorphine dose regulation in the United States, examines pharmacological and clinical research results with buprenorphine doses up to 32 mg/d, and evaluates whether diversion concerns justify maintaining a low buprenorphine dose limit.

resultsPharmacological and clinical research results consistently demonstrate buprenorphine's dose-dependent benefits up to at least 32 mg/d, including reductions in withdrawal symptoms, craving, opioid reward, and illicit use while improving retention in care. Diverted buprenorphine is most often used to treat withdrawal symptoms and reduce illicit opioid use when legal access to it is limited.

conclusionsIn light of established research and profound harms from fentanyl, the Food and Drug Administration's current recommendations on target dose and dose limit are outdated and causing harm. An update to the buprenorphine package label with recommended dosing up to 32 mg/d and elimination of the 16 mg/d target dose would improve treatment effectiveness and save lives.

Indexed as

BuprenorphineDrug OverdoseOpioid-Related DisordersSubstance Withdrawal SyndromeAnalgesics, OpioidFentanylHumansNarcotic AntagonistsAnalgesics, OpioidBuprenorphineFentanylNarcotic Antagonists

Identifiers

PMID37788601
PMCPMC10547105
OpenAlexW4380885486

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.