ArticlePloS one2023
Integrating gene expression data into a genome-scale metabolic model to identify reprogramming during adaptive evolution.
Article in PloS one, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The development of a method for identifying latent reprogramming in gene expression data resulting from adaptive laboratory evolution (ALE) in response to genetic or environmental perturbations has been a challenge. In this study, a method called Metabolic Reprogramming Identifier (MRI), based on the integration of expression data to a genome-scale metabolic model has been developed. To identify key genes playing the main role in reprogramming, a MILP problem is presented and maximization of an adaptation score as a criterion indicating a pattern of using metabolism with maximum utilization of gene expression resources is defined as an objective function. Then, genes with complete expression usage and significant expression differences between wild-type and evolved strains were selected as key genes for reprogramming. This score is also applied to evaluate the compatibility of expression patterns with maximal use of key genes. The method was implemented to investigate the reprogramming of Escherichia coli during adaptive evolution caused by changing carbon sources. cyoC and cydB responsible for establishing proton gradient across the inner membrane were identified to be vital in the E. coli reprogramming when switching from glucose to lactate. These results indicate the importance of the inner membrane in reprogramming of E. coli to adapt to the new environment. The method predicts no reprogramming occurs during the evolution for growth on glycerol.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.