Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37787998›Full record

Trial reportClinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research2023

Potential of Fecal Microbiota Transplantation to Prevent Acute GVHD: Analysis from a Phase II Trial.

Armin Rashidi, Maryam Ebadi, Tauseef Ur Rehman, Heba Elhusseini, David Kazadi, Hossam Halaweish, Mohammad H Khan, Andrea Hoeschen, Qing Cao, Xianghua Luo and 6 more

Open access · greenAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase II
In one paragraph

Trial report in Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
6.2field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. CommensalGut · 2025
    Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Armin RashidiDivision of Hematology, Oncology, and Transplantation, Department of Medicine, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota.ORCID 0000-0002-9384-272X
Maryam EbadiDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Washington and Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, Washington.ORCID 0009-0004-5848-4789
Tauseef Ur RehmanDivision of Hematology, Oncology, and Transplantation, Department of Medicine, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota.ORCID 0000-0001-6939-8027
Heba ElhusseiniDivision of Hematology, Oncology, and Transplantation, Department of Medicine, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota.ORCID 0000-0002-4933-4584
David KazadiDepartment of Medicine, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota.ORCID 0000-0001-5117-2900
Hossam HalaweishDepartment of Surgery, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota.ORCID 0009-0006-6507-4758
Mohammad H KhanDepartment of Surgery, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota.ORCID 0000-0001-9603-7593
Andrea HoeschenDivision of Hematology, Oncology, and Transplantation, Department of Medicine, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota.ORCID 0000-0001-6920-1183
Qing CaoBiostatistics Core, Masonic Cancer Center, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota.ORCID 0000-0002-1523-8797
Xianghua LuoBiostatistics Core, Masonic Cancer Center, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota.ORCID 0000-0001-7501-6582
Amanda J KabageDivision of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition, Department of Medicine, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota.ORCID 0000-0003-3519-7416
Sharon LopezDivision of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition, Department of Medicine, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota.ORCID 0000-0002-1744-4447
Shernan G HoltanDivision of Hematology, Oncology, and Transplantation, Department of Medicine, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota.ORCID 0000-0002-5054-9419
Daniel J WeisdorfDivision of Hematology, Oncology, and Transplantation, Department of Medicine, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota.ORCID 0000-0001-8078-8579
Alexander KhorutsDivision of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition, Department of Medicine, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota.ORCID 0000-0002-3205-3188
Christopher StaleyDepartment of Surgery, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota.ORCID 0000-0002-2309-0083
University of Minnesota · USFred Hutch Cancer Center · USUniversity of Minnesota Medical Center · US

Funding

Women's CancerP30CA077598 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA TWIN CITIES · PI Timothy C. Hallstrom · 1998 to 2026
$100.4M
University of Minnesota Clinical and Translational Science Institute (UMN CTSI)UL1TR002494 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI BLAZAR, BRUCE R, WEISDORF, DANIEL J · 2018 to 2022
$34.9M
Institutional Career Development CoreKL2TR002492 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI INGBAR, DAVID H · 2018 to 2022
$6.3M
NCATS NIH HHS KL2 TR002492NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR002494NCI NIH HHS P30 CA077598
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeIntestinal microbiota disruptions early after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation have been associated with increased risk for acute GVHD (aGVHD). In our recent randomized phase II trial of oral, encapsulated, third-party fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) versus placebo, FMT at the time of neutrophil recovery was safe and ameliorated dysbiosis. Here, we evaluated in post hoc analysis whether donor microbiota engraftment after FMT may protect against aGVHD. EXPERIMENTAL

designWe analyzed pre- and post-FMT stool samples and estimated donor microbiota engraftment (a preplanned secondary endpoint) by determining the fraction of post-FMT microbiota formed by unique donor taxa (donor microbiota fraction; dMf).

resultsdMf was higher in patients who later developed grade I or no aGVHD (median 33.9%; range, 1.6%-74.3%) than those who developed grade II-IV aGVHD (median 25.3%; range, 2.2%-34.8%; P = 0.006). The cumulative incidence of grade II-IV aGVHD by day 180 was lower in the group with greater-than-median dMf than the group with less-than-median dMf [14.3% (95% confidence interval, CI, 2.1-37.5) vs. 76.9% (95% CI, 39.7-92.8), P = 0.008]. The only determinant of dMf in cross-validated least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO)-regularized regression was the patient's pre-FMT microbiota diversity (Pearson correlation coefficient -0.82, P = 1.6 × 10-9), indicating more potent microbiota modulation by FMT in patients with more severe dysbiosis. Microbiota network analysis revealed major rewiring including changes in the most central nodes, without emergence of keystone species, as a potential mechanism of FMT effect.

conclusionsFMT may have protective effects against aGVHD, especially in patients with more severe microbiota disruptions.

Indexed as

Gastrointestinal MicrobiomeGraft vs Host DiseaseMicrobiotaDysbiosisFecal Microbiota TransplantationHumansTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

PMID37787998
PMCPMC10841695
OpenAlexW4387296461

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.