ArticleJournal of digital imaging2023
Bayesian Convolutional Neural Networks in Medical Imaging Classification: A Promising Solution for Deep Learning Limits in Data Scarcity Scenarios.
Article in Journal of digital imaging, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Uncertainty quantification for artificial intelligence in medical imaging: what every radiologist needs to know.Abdominal radiology (New York) · 2026Review
- Hepatic Fat Quantification Using Beta Distribution and a Probabilistic Neural Network in a Prepubertal Male Cohort.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Advances in Machine Learning for Mechanically Ventilated Patients.International journal of general medicine · 2025Review
- Prognostic value of plasma microRNAs for non-small cell lung cancer based on data mining models.BMC cancer · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Deep neural networks (DNNs) have already impacted the field of medicine in data analysis, classification, and image processing. Unfortunately, their performance is drastically reduced when datasets are scarce in nature (e.g., rare diseases or early-research data). In such scenarios, DNNs display poor capacity for generalization and often lead to highly biased estimates and silent failures. Moreover, deterministic systems cannot provide epistemic uncertainty, a key component to asserting the model's reliability. In this work, we developed a probabilistic system for classification as a framework for addressing the aforementioned criticalities. Specifically, we implemented a Bayesian convolutional neural network (BCNN) for the classification of cardiac amyloidosis (CA) subtypes. We prepared four different CNNs: base-deterministic, dropout-deterministic, dropout-Bayesian, and Bayesian. We then trained them on a dataset of 1107 PET images from 47 CA and control patients (data scarcity scenario). The Bayesian model achieved performances (78.28 (1.99) % test accuracy) comparable to the base-deterministic, dropout-deterministic, and dropout-Bayesian ones, while showing strongly increased "Out of Distribution" input detection (validation-test accuracy mismatch reduction). Additionally, both the dropout-Bayesian and the Bayesian models enriched the classification through confidence estimates, while reducing the criticalities of the dropout-deterministic and base-deterministic approaches. This in turn increased the model's reliability, also providing much needed insights into the network's estimates. The obtained results suggest that a Bayesian CNN can be a promising solution for addressing the challenges posed by data scarcity in medical imaging classification tasks.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.