Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37787862›Full record

ArticleKnee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA2023

Physician preferences in diagnostics and treatment of juvenile osteochondritis dissecans are diverse across the knee, ankle and elbow: an ESSKA survey.

Laura A M Kemmeren, Christiaan J A van Bergen, Max Reijman, Tom M Piscaer

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Laura A M KemmerenDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery and Sports Medicine, Erasmus Medical Centre, Sophia Children's Hospital, Dr. Molewaterplein 40, 3015GD, Rotterdam, The Netherlands. l.kemmeren@erasmusmc.nl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0005-1845-8372
Christiaan J A van BergenDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery and Sports Medicine, Erasmus Medical Centre, Sophia Children's Hospital, Dr. Molewaterplein 40, 3015GD, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Max ReijmanDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery and Sports Medicine, Erasmus Medical Centre, Sophia Children's Hospital, Dr. Molewaterplein 40, 3015GD, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Tom M PiscaerDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery and Sports Medicine, Erasmus Medical Centre, Sophia Children's Hospital, Dr. Molewaterplein 40, 3015GD, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Erasmus MC - Sophia Children’s Hospital · NLAmphia Ziekenhuis · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo investigate the current preferences regarding the work-up and treatment choices of juvenile osteochondritis dissecans (JOCD) of the knee, ankle and elbow among orthopaedic surgeons.

methodsAn international survey was set up for all European Society of Sports Traumatology, Knee Surgery and Arthroscopy (ESSKA) members, which assessed various questions on diagnosis and treatment of JOCD of different joints. Respondents answered questions for one or more joints, based on their expertise. Proportions of answers were calculated and compared between joints. Consensus was defined as more than 75% agreement on an item; disagreement was defined as less than 25% agreement.

resultsFifty physicians responded to the survey, of whom forty-two filled out the questions on the knee, fourteen on the ankle and nine on the elbow. Plain radiography and MRI were the most used imaging modalities for the assessment and follow-up of JOCD in the knee and ankle, but not for the elbow. MRI was also the preferred method to assess the stability of a lesion in the knee and ankle. There was universal agreement on activity and/or sports restriction as the non-operative treatment of choice for JOCD. Size, stability and physeal closure were the most important prognostic factors in determining the operative technique for the elbow. For the knee, these factors were size and stability and for the ankle, these were size and location.

conclusionActivity and/or sports restriction was the non-operative treatment of choice. Furthermore, plain radiography and MRI were the preferred imaging modalities for the knee and ankle, but not for the elbow. For determining the operative technique, physicians agreed that the size of the lesion is an important prognostic factor in all joints. These findings help us understand how juvenile osteochondritis dissecans is treated in current practice and may provide opportunities for improvement. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level V.

Indexed as

Osteochondritis DissecansPhysiciansAnkleElbowHumansKneeKnee JointAdolescentAnkleArthroscopyCartilageDrillingElbowESSKAJuvenile osteochondritis dissecansKneeOsteochondral defectOsteochondritis dissecansPaediatricSurvey

Identifiers

PMID37787862
PMCPMC10598091
OpenAlexW4387296118

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.