Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37787859›Full record

ReviewCurrent cardiology reports2023

Contrast Echocardiography for Assessing Myocardial Perfusion.

Sofia Capdeville, Bethany A Gholson, Jonathan R Lindner

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Current cardiology reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Microbubble Contrast Agent Use During Invasive Coronary Microvascular Assessment.Journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography & Interventions · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Research Progress in Imaging Evaluation of Myocardial Microcirculation.International journal of general medicine · 2025
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Development of Ultrasound Microbubbles and Phase Shift Microbubbles in Theranostics.Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. Nanomedicine and nanobiotechnology
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Sofia CapdevilleDivision of Cardiovascular Medicine and Robert M. Berne Cardiovascular Research Center, University of Virginia, 415 Lane Rd, Box 801394, Charlottesville, VA, 22903, USA.
Bethany A GholsonDivision of Cardiovascular Medicine and Robert M. Berne Cardiovascular Research Center, University of Virginia, 415 Lane Rd, Box 801394, Charlottesville, VA, 22903, USA.
Jonathan R LindnerDivision of Cardiovascular Medicine and Robert M. Berne Cardiovascular Research Center, University of Virginia, 415 Lane Rd, Box 801394, Charlottesville, VA, 22903, USA. jlindner@virginia.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2604-5277
University of Virginia · US

Funding

CSR NIH HHS R01-HL0178610CSR NIH HHS R01-HL130046CSR NIH HHS R01-HL165422NASA 18-18HCFBP_2-0009
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewImprovements in ultrasound methods for detecting microbubble ultrasound enhancing agents have led to an increase in the use of perfusion imaging with myocardial contrast echocardiography (MCE). This technique is now beginning to play an important role in specific clinical scenarios, which is the focus of this review. RECENT

findingsMCE was originally conceived as a technique for detecting resting perfusion abnormalities related to ischemia at rest or during stress from coronary artery disease. More recently, MCE has increasingly been used in circumstances where the technique's ability to provide rapid, quantitative, or bedside assessment of perfusion is advantageous. Quantitative MCE is also increasingly being used as a research technique for evaluating pathobiology and therapy that involve changes in the myocardial microcirculation. While MCE was developed and validated decades ago, it is only now beginning to be used by an increasing number of clinicians due to improvements in imaging technology and recognition of specific situations where the technique is impactful.

Indexed as

Coronary Artery DiseaseCoronary CirculationContrast MediaEchocardiographyHumansMicrobubblesMyocardiumSensitivity and SpecificityContrast MediaMicrobubblesMicrocirculationMyocardial contrast echocardiography

Identifiers

PMID37787859
OpenAlexW4387296676

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.