Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37787842›Full record

ArticleThe European journal of health economics : HEPAC : health economics in prevention and care2024

How do family doctors respond to reduced waiting times for cancer diagnosis in secondary care?

Helen Hayes, Rachel Meacock, Jonathan Stokes, Matt Sutton

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The European journal of health economics : HEPAC : health economics in prevention and care, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Helen HayesOffice of Health Economics (OHE), London, UK. hhayes@ohe.org.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6081-5266
Rachel MeacockHealth Organisation, Policy and Economics (HOPE), Centre for Primary Care & Health Services Research, School of Health Sciences, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
Jonathan StokesHealth Organisation, Policy and Economics (HOPE), Centre for Primary Care & Health Services Research, School of Health Sciences, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
Matt SuttonHealth Organisation, Policy and Economics (HOPE), Centre for Primary Care & Health Services Research, School of Health Sciences, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
Manchester Academic Health Science Centre · GBThe University of Melbourne · AU

Funding

International Alliance for Cancer Early Detection (ACED) [C1994/A29320]Medical Research Council [MR/T027517/1]Medical Research Council MR/T027517/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Reducing waiting times is a priority in public health systems. Efforts of healthcare providers to shorten waiting times could be negated if they simultaneously induce substantial increases in demand. However, separating out the effects of changes in supply and demand on waiting times requires an exogenous change in one element. We examine the impact of a pilot programme in some English hospitals to shorten waiting times for urgent diagnosis of suspected cancer on family doctors' referrals. We examine referrals from 6,666 family doctor partnerships to 145 hospitals between 1st April 2012 and 31st March 2019. Five hospitals piloted shorter waiting times initiatives in 2017. Using continuous difference-in-differences regression, we exploit the pilot as a 'supply shifter' to estimate the effect of waiting times on referral volumes for two suspected cancer types: bowel and lung. The proportion of referred patients breaching two-week waiting times targets for suspected bowel cancer fell by 3.9 percentage points in pilot hospitals in response to the policy, from a baseline of 4.8%. Family doctors exposed to the pilot increased their referrals (demand) by 10.8%. However, the pilot was not successful for lung cancer, with some evidence that waiting times increased, and a corresponding reduction in referrals of -10.5%. Family doctor referrals for suspected cancer are responsive at the margin to waiting times. Healthcare providers may struggle to achieve long-term reductions in waiting times if supply-side improvements are offset by increases in demand.

Indexed as

Referral and ConsultationWaiting ListsEnglandFemaleHumansLung NeoplasmsMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasmsPhysicians, FamilyPilot ProjectsSecondary Health CareTime FactorsDemand elasticityEarly detection of cancerFamily doctorsReferralsWaiting times

Identifiers

PMID37787842
PMCPMC11192671
OpenAlexW4387296911

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.