Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37787812›Full record

ArticleJournal of neurology2024

Factors impacting trial participation in people with motor neuron disease.

Emily Beswick, Micheala Johnson, Judith Newton, Rachel Dakin, Amy Stenson, Sharon Abrahams, Alan Carson, Siddharthan Chandran, Suvankar Pal

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neurology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Emily BeswickCentre for Clinical Brain Sciences, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, Scotland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9843-0778
Micheala JohnsonCentre for Clinical Brain Sciences, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, Scotland.
Judith NewtonCentre for Clinical Brain Sciences, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, Scotland.
Rachel DakinCentre for Clinical Brain Sciences, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, Scotland.
Amy StensonCentre for Clinical Brain Sciences, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, Scotland.
Sharon AbrahamsEuan MacDonald Centre for MND Research, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, Scotland.
Alan CarsonCentre for Clinical Brain Sciences, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, Scotland.
Siddharthan ChandranCentre for Clinical Brain Sciences, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, Scotland.
Suvankar PalCentre for Clinical Brain Sciences, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, Scotland. Suvankar.Pal@ed.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4276-639X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Motor neuron disease (MND) is a rapidly progressive neurodegenerative disorder with limited treatment options. Historically, neurological trials have been plagued by suboptimal recruitment and high rates of attrition. The Motor Neuron Disease-Systematic Multi-Arm Randomised Adaptive Trial (MND-SMART) seeks to identify effective disease modifying drugs. This study investigates person-specific factors affecting recruitment and retention. Improved understanding of these factors may improve trial protocol design, optimise recruitment and retention. Participants with MND completed questionnaires and this was supplemented with clinical data. 12 months after completing the questionnaires we used MND-SMART recruitment data to establish if members of our cohort engaged with the trial. 120 people with MND completed questionnaires for this study. Mean age at participation was 66 (SD = 9), 14% (n = 17) were categorised as long survivors, with 68% (n = 81) of participants male and 60% (n = 73) had the ALS sub-type. Of the 120 study participants, 50% (n = 60) were randomised into MND-SMART and 78% (n = 94) expressed interest an in participating. After the 1-year follow-up period 65% (n = 39) of the 60 randomised participants remained in MND-SMART. Older age was significantly associated with reduced likelihood of participation (OR = 0.92, 95% CI = 0.88-0.96, p = 0.000488). The findings show that people with MND are highly motivated to engage in research, but older individuals remain significantly less likely to participate. We recommend the inclusion of studies to explore characteristics of prospective and current participants alongside trials.

Indexed as

Amyotrophic Lateral SclerosisMotor Neuron DiseaseAdaptive Clinical Trials as TopicFemaleHumansMaleProbabilityProspective StudiesRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicAmyotrophic lateral sclerosisClinical trialsMotor neuron diseaseRecruitment

Identifiers

PMID37787812
PMCPMC10769905

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.