Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37787594›Full record

ArticleCanadian Urological Association journal = Journal de l'Association des urologues du Canada2023

Evaluating the perceptions of Canadian urology residents and program directors regarding the current training in genitourinary imaging.

David Bouhadana, Sarah Elbaz, Rose Di Ioia, Anne Xuan-Lan Nguyen, Diana Benea, Claudia Deyirmendjian, David-Dan Nguyen, Brendan Raizenne, Isabelle Hardy, Paul Perotte and 5 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Canadian Urological Association journal = Journal de l'Association des urologues du Canada, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

David BouhadanaFaculty of Medicine, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada.
Sarah ElbazFaculty of Medicine, Laval University, Montreal, QC, Canada.
Rose Di IoiaFaculty of Medicine, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada.
Anne Xuan-Lan NguyenFaculty of Medicine, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada.
Diana BeneaFaculty of Medicine, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada.
Claudia DeyirmendjianFaculty of Medicine, Université de Montréal, Montreal, QC, Canada.
David-Dan NguyenDivision of Urology, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Brendan RaizenneDivision of Urology, University of Montréal, Montreal, QC, Canada.
Isabelle HardyDepartment of Ophthalmology, University of Montréal, Montreal, QC, Canada.
Paul PerotteDivision of Urology, University of Montréal, Montreal, QC, Canada.
Samuel LagabrielleDivision of Urology, Sherbrooke University, Sherbrooke, QC, Canada.
Jason Y LeeDivision of Urology, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Peter D MetcalfeDivision of Urology, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada.
Rehana JafferDepartment of Diagnostic Radiology, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada.
Naeem BhojaniDivision of Urology, University of Montréal, Montreal, QC, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionCompetency in interpreting genitourinary (GU) imaging is an important skill for urologists; however, no nationally accredited GU imaging curriculum exists for Canadian urology residency training programs. The main objectives of our study were to 1) characterize GU imaging training in Canada; (2) evaluate residents' self-perceived competencies in interpreting GU imaging; (3) explore program directors' (PD) and residents' perceptions regarding the current imaging curriculum and suggestions for future directions.

methodsFrom November to December 2022, a survey examining current imaging education in residency, perceived resident imaging knowledge, avenues for improvement in imaging education, and the role of point-of-care ultrasound within urology was distributed to all Canadian urology PDs and residents.

resultsAll PDs (13/13) and 40% (72/178) of residents completed the survey. Only two programs had a formal GU imaging curriculum. PDs and residents reported trainees were least comfortable interpreting Doppler ultrasound of renal, gonadal, and penile vessels. PDs reported that residents were most comfortable with non-contrast computed tomography (CT) scans (9.5/10), CT urogram (9.3/10), and retrograde pyelography (9.3/10). All but one PD favored increasing imaging training in their program. PDs highlighted the lack of time in the curriculum (n=3) and lack of educators (n=3) as the primary barriers to increasing imaging training in their program.

conclusionsMost PDs and residents believe there needs to be more imaging training offered at their institution; however, addressing this is challenging due to the limited time in the curriculum and the need for available educators.

Identifiers

PMID37787594
PMCPMC10697708

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.