Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37787591›Full record

ArticleCanadian Urological Association journal = Journal de l'Association des urologues du Canada2023

Regional differences in metastatic urothelial carcinoma of the urinary bladder patients across the United States SEER registries.

Cristina Cano Garcia, Stefano Tappero, Mattia Luca Piccinelli, Francesco Barletta, Reha-Baris Incesu, Simone Morra, Lukas Scheipner, Andrea Baudo, Zhe Tian, Fred Saad and 12 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Canadian Urological Association journal = Journal de l'Association des urologues du Canada, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

22 authors.

Cristina Cano GarciaCancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, QC, Canada.
Stefano TapperoCancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, QC, Canada.
Mattia Luca PiccinelliCancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, QC, Canada.
Francesco BarlettaCancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, QC, Canada.
Reha-Baris IncesuCancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, QC, Canada.
Simone MorraCancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, QC, Canada.
Lukas ScheipnerCancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, QC, Canada.
Andrea BaudoCancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, QC, Canada.
Zhe TianCancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, QC, Canada.
Fred SaadCancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, QC, Canada.
Shahrokh F ShariatDepartment of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Luca CarmignaniDepartment of Urology, IRCCS Ospedale Galeazzi - Sant'Ambrogio, Milan, Italy.
Sascha AhyaiDepartment of Urology, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria.
Nicola LongoDepartment of Neurosciences, Reproductive Sciences and Odontostomatology, Urology Unit, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy.
Derya TilkiDepartment of Urology, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
Alberto BrigantiUnit of Urology/Division of Oncology, Gianfranco Soldera Prostate Cancer Lab, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy; Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy.
Ottavio De CobelliDepartment of Urology, IEO European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milan, Italy.
Carlo TerroneDepartment of Urology, IRCCS Policlinico San Martino, Genova, Italy.
Severine BanekGoethe University Frankfurt, Department of Urology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Germany.
Luis KluthGoethe University Frankfurt, Department of Urology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Germany.
Felix K H ChunGoethe University Frankfurt, Department of Urology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Germany.
Pierre I KarakiewiczCancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, QC, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionDespite advances in treatment, metastatic urothelial carcinoma of the urinary bladder (mUCUB) is associated with high mortality and treatment risk. We tested for regional differences in mUCUB within a large-scale, population-based database.

methodsUsing the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) database (2010-2018), patient (age, sex, race/ethnicity), tumor (T-stage, N-stage, number of metastatic sites), and treatment (systemic therapy, radical cystectomy) characteristics were tabulated for mUCUB patients according to 11 SEER registries. Multinomial regression models and multivariable Cox regression models tested overall mortality (OM), adjusting for patient, tumor and treatment characteristics.

resultsIn 4817 mUCUB patients, registry-specific patient counts ranged from 1855 (38.5%) to 105 (2.2%). Important inter-regional differences existed for race/ethnicity (3-36% for others than non-Hispanic Whites), N-stage (28-39% for N1-3, 44-58% in N0, 8-22% for unknown N-stage), systemic therapy (38-54%) and radical cystectomy (3-11%). In multivariable analyses adjusting for these patient, tumor, and treatment characteristics, one registry exhibited significantly lower OM (SEER registry 10: hazard ratio [HR] 0.83) and two other registries exhibited significantly higher OM (SEER registries 9: HR 1.13; SEER registry 8: HR 1.24) relative to the largest reference registry (n=1855).

conclusionsWe identified important regional differences that included patient, tumor, and treatment characteristics. Even after adjustment for these characteristics, important OM differences persisted, which may warrant more detailed investigation.

Identifiers

PMID37787591
PMCPMC10697709

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.