ArticleCanadian Urological Association journal = Journal de l'Association des urologues du Canada2023
Persistent need for ongoing medical or surgical therapy despite UroLift: Data from an academic center.
Article in Canadian Urological Association journal = Journal de l'Association des urologues du Canada, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionThe prostatic urethral lift (PUL) is a popular surgical option for benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) with lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS). Prior 5-year data from the multicenter L.I.F.T. trial suggested durability and a surgical retreatment rate of 13.6% at five years. We assessed the proportion of patients who had ongoing medical or surgical BPH management following PUL.
methodsWith institutional review board approval, cases of PUL performed from 2015-2020 at our academic institution were retrospectively reviewed for management of BPH following PUL.
resultsA total of 209 men were identified, with followup available for 198 (95%). Mean age was 68.9 years and mean followup was 18.5 months. Mean prostate size was 43 g. Patients were discharged from recovery in 97% of cases, with 29% discharged with indwelling or intermittent catheterization. The rate of 30-day complications was 18%, with 89% graded Clavien I-II. Postoperatively, mean improvements in International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) and quality of life subscore (QoL) were 5.3 and 1.1 points, respectively. Unplanned emergency room or clinic visits within 30 days of the procedure occurred in 14% and 17% of men, respectively, with 4% requiring hospital readmission. In followup, α-blockers and/or 5α-reductase inhibitors were continued or initiated postoperatively for 44% of men; 20% of men required repeat surgical intervention at a mean of 19.2 months (1.4-56.4), consisting of repeat PUL (30%), transurethral resection of prostate (28%), or thulium laser enucleation (18%). Overall, 53% of men needed medication and/or repeat surgery for BPH following PUL, and this was independent of age, race, prostate volume, intravesical prostate protrusion, baseline IPSS and QOL, stricture, number of implants used, or a history of urinary retention (p>0.05).
conclusionsMost men undergoing PUL require ongoing medical and/or surgical management for BPH. Patients should be counseled as to the likelihood of failure as a unimodal therapy long-term.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.