Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37787064›Full record

ArticleGigaScience2022

Construction and analysis of the chromosome-level haplotype-resolved genomes of two Crassostrea oyster congeners: Crassostrea angulata and Crassostrea gigas.

Haigang Qi, Rihao Cong, Yanjun Wang, Li Li, Guofan Zhang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in GigaScience, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Comparative Genomics ofEcology and evolution · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. OysterDB: A Genome Database for Ostreidae.Marine biotechnology (New York, N.Y.) · 2024
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Genome-Wide Association Analysis of Heat Tolerance in FInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Haigang QiCAS and Shandong Province Key Laboratory of Experimental Marine Biology, Center for Ocean Mega-Science, Institute of Oceanology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Qingdao 266071, China.ORCID 0000-0002-5077-9775
Rihao CongCAS and Shandong Province Key Laboratory of Experimental Marine Biology, Center for Ocean Mega-Science, Institute of Oceanology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Qingdao 266071, China.ORCID 0009-0004-7787-0271
Yanjun WangMarine Science Data Center, Institute of Oceanology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Qingdao 266071, China.ORCID 0000-0001-6462-2800
Li LiCAS and Shandong Province Key Laboratory of Experimental Marine Biology, Center for Ocean Mega-Science, Institute of Oceanology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Qingdao 266071, China.ORCID 0000-0002-5913-4447
Guofan ZhangCAS and Shandong Province Key Laboratory of Experimental Marine Biology, Center for Ocean Mega-Science, Institute of Oceanology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Qingdao 266071, China.ORCID 0000-0001-9890-2659

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe Portuguese oyster Crassostrea angulata and the Pacific oyster C. gigas are two major Crassostrea species that are naturally distributed along the Northwest Pacific coast and possess great ecological and economic value. Here, we report the construction and comparative analysis of the chromosome-level haplotype-resolved genomes of the two oyster congeners.

findingsBased on a trio-binning strategy, the PacBio high-fidelity and Illumina Hi-C reads of the offspring of the hybrid cross C. angulata (♂) × C. gigas (♀) were partitioned and independently assembled to construct two chromosome-level fully phased genomes. The assembly size (contig N50 size, BUSCO completeness) of the two genomes were 582.4 M (12.8 M, 99.1%) and 606.4 M (5.46 M, 98.9%) for C. angulata and C. gigas, respectively, ranking at the top of mollusk genomes with high contiguity and integrity. The general features of the two genomes were highly similar, and 15,475 highly conserved ortholog gene pairs shared identical gene structures and similar genomic locations. Highly similar sequences can be primarily identified in the coding regions, whereas most noncoding regions and introns of genes in the same ortholog group contain substantial small genomic and/or structural variations. Based on population resequencing analysis, a total of 2,756 species-specific single-nucleotide polymorphisms and 1,088 genes possibly under selection were identified.

conclusionsThis is the first report of trio-binned fully phased chromosome-level genomes in marine invertebrates. The study provides fundamental resources for the research on mollusk genetics, comparative genomics, and molecular evolution.

Indexed as

CrassostreaAnimalsChromosomesGenomeHaplotypesPolymorphism, Single NucleotideCrassostrea angulataCrassostrea gigashaplotype-resolved genomeoystertrio-binning

Identifiers

PMID37787064
PMCPMC10546077

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.