Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37787047›Full record

ReviewExperimental biology and medicine (Maywood, N.J.)2023

Ubiquitination detection techniques.

Anthony Ruvindi I De Silva, Richard C Page

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Experimental biology and medicine (Maywood, N.J.), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Exploring the potential function of high expression ofWorld journal of gastrointestinal oncology · 2025
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. American journal of translational research · 2025
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Anthony Ruvindi I De Silva
Richard C PageDepartment of Chemistry and Biochemistry, Miami University, Oxford, OH 45056, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-3006-3171

Funding

Triage mechanisms for directing protein refolding and degradationR35GM128595 · NIGMS · MIAMI UNIVERSITY OXFORD · PI Richard C Page · 2018 to 2026
$2.8M
NIGMS NIH HHS R35 GM128595
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ubiquitination is an intricately regulated post-translational modification that involves the covalent attachment of ubiquitin to a substrate protein. The complex dynamic nature of the ubiquitination process regulates diverse cellular functions including targeting proteins for degradation, cell cycle, deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) damage repair, and numerous cell signaling pathways. Ubiquitination also serves as a crucial mechanism in protein quality control. Dysregulation in ubiquitination could result in lethal disease conditions such as cancers and neurodegenerative diseases. Therefore, the ubiquitination cascade has become an attractive target for therapeutic interventions. Enormous efforts have been made to detect ubiquitination involving different detection techniques to better grasp the underlying molecular mechanisms of ubiquitination. This review discusses a wide range of techniques stretching from the simplest assays to real-time assays. This includes western blotting/immunoblotting, fluorescence assays, chemiluminescence assays, spectrophotometric assays, and nanopore sensing assays. This review compares these applications, and the inherent advantages and limitations.

Indexed as

ProteinsUbiquitinProtein Processing, Post-TranslationalUbiquitinationUbiquitin-Protein LigasesProteinsUbiquitinUbiquitin-Protein Ligaseschemiluminescencedetection techniquesfluorescencespectrophotometricUbiquitination

Identifiers

PMID37787047
PMCPMC10625345

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.