Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37786824›Full record

ArticleIndian journal of hematology & blood transfusion : an official journal of Indian Society of Hematology and Blood Transfusion2023

Effective and Elaborative Induction Program for Mitigating Myths and Misconceptions Linked to Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation in a Resource Limited Setting.

Safaa A A Khaled, Mahmoud M Elzembely, Asmaa M A Soliman, Nahed Shwakat, Nashwa Rafaat, Mohamed A Malek, Esmat S Abdelmageed

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Indian journal of hematology & blood transfusion : an official journal of Indian Society of Hematology and Blood Transfusion, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05151406 (Myths and Misconceptions About HSCT in a Limited Resource Region), which is not on this map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05151406 nacompletednot on this map

Myths and Misconceptions About HSCT in a Limited Resource Region: Current Situation and Future Directions

TypeinterventionalSponsorAssiut UniversityRan2021 to 2021Enrolled218ConditionsHematopoietic Stem Cell TransplantationArmseducational program
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Safaa A A KhaledDepartment of Internal Medicine-Clinical Hematology Unit, Assiut University Hospital, Assiut, Egypt.ORCID 0000-0002-2239-7219
Mahmoud M ElzembelyDepartment of Pediatric Oncology, South Egypt Cancer Institute, Faculty of Medicine, Assiut University, Assiut, Egypt.
Asmaa M A SolimanDepartment of Public Health and Community Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Assiut University, Assiut, Egypt.
Nahed ShwakatDepartment of Nursing Administration, Faculty of Nursing, Assiut University, Assiut, Egypt.
Nashwa RafaatDepartment of Pharmacology, Faculty of Medicine, Assiut University, Assiut, Egypt.
Mohamed A MalekFaculty of Medicine, Assiut University, Assiut, Egypt.
Esmat S AbdelmageedDepartment of Medical Surgical Nursing, Faculty of Nursing, Assiut University, Assiut, Egypt.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Since the first transplant in 1957 and hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) is the curative modality for numerous hematological disorders. Nevertheless, it is not available for all patients. Besides unavailability of matched donors a lot of factors could hinder HSCT in a resource limited setting, as financial and administrative factors. In our daily practice we noticed other factors that hinder HSCT in our center, the common myths and misconceptions about HSCT and donation. This quasi-experimental study assessed, for the first time, common myths and misconceptions about HSCT among 218 medical and nursing students before and after an interventional educational program. The study tool was an investigators' developed self-administered questionnaire. Participants' male to female ratio was 1:2.5, and FAS was middle in 52.7%. Pretest high myths scores were reported in 53.4% and 90% of medical and nursing students that was reduced to 0% and 4% post-test, respectively. Pretest, 26.3% and 7% of medical and nursing students welling to donate HSC, that increased to 66% and 39% post-test, respectively. Rural residency, low and middle FAS associated with higher myths scores. Myths score is an independent effector of willingness to donate HSC among participants. In conclusion medical/nursing students had significant myths and misconceptions about HSCT that was corrected with the educational program. Thus, wide based educational programs about HSCT are mandatory to correct myths and augment HSC donation. www.clinicaltrrial.gov: clinical trial ID NCT05151406. Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s12288-023-01634-5.

Indexed as

HSCTMisconceptionsMythsResource limited

Identifiers

PMID37786824
PMCPMC10542043

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.