ArticleFuture healthcare journal2023
Impact of the increase in tuition fees and demographic factors on medical student intercalation rates between 2006 and 2020.
Article in Future healthcare journal, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Understanding medical students' intercalation decisions to preserve the clinical academic pipeline: a mixed-method survey.BMC medical education · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: No quantitative research has assessed the trends in English medical student intercalation. In addition, the impacts of the increase in tuition fees, introduced in 2012, and demographic factors on intercalation rates are unknown. Methods: Freedom of information requests were sent to all UK universities. Regression analysis compared intercalation rates before (2006-2012) and after (2012-2020) the tuition fee increase. Student's Results: In total, 101,085 students from seven universities responded. The intercalation rate increased from 4.70% to 10.53% (mean percentage difference (MPD) 5.84; 95% confidence interval (CI) 2.94-8.73). Intercalating students were more likely to be <25 years of age (MPD 33.36%; 95%CI 28.34-38.39), without a previous degree (MPD 8.56%; 95% CI 7.00-10.11) and without a disability (MPD 3.15%; 95% CI 0.88-5.42). In total, 389 completed questionnaires were received from 10 universities. Medical students believed an intercalated degree made them a better doctor. Discussion: The proportion of students who intercalated was greater following the increase in tuition fees. This might be explained by the value medical that students placed on the skills and opportunities that accompany an intercalated degree.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.