Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37786624›Full record

ArticleAdvances in neural information processing systems2022

Exploring the Whole Rashomon Set of Sparse Decision Trees.

Rui Xin, Chudi Zhong, Zhi Chen, Takuya Takagi, Margo Seltzer, Cynthia Rudin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Advances in neural information processing systems, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Risk Assessment in Peacekeeping: Are Visual Sparse Models Transparent?Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Journal of the American Statistical Association · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. A Path to Simpler Models Starts With Noise.Advances in neural information processing systems · 2023
    Article
  7. Exploring and Interacting with the Set of Good Sparse Generalized Additive Models.Advances in neural information processing systems · 2023
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Decision trees: from efficient prediction to responsible AI.Frontiers in artificial intelligence · 2023
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Fast Sparse Decision Tree Optimization via Reference Ensembles.Proceedings of the ... AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence. AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence · 2022
    Article
  12. Exploring the Whole Rashomon Set of Sparse Decision Trees.Advances in neural information processing systems · 2022
    Article
  13. Article
  14. A United States Fair Lending Perspective on Machine Learning.Frontiers in artificial intelligence · 2021
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Rui XinDuke University.
Chudi ZhongDuke University.
Zhi ChenDuke University.
Takuya TakagiFujitsu Laboratories Ltd.
Margo SeltzerThe University of British Columbia.
Cynthia RudinDuke University.

Funding

A machine learning framework for understanding impacts on the HIV latent reservoir size, including drugs of abuseR01DA054994 · NIDA · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI RUDIN, CYNTHIA · 2021 to 2025
$2.3M
NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA054994
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In any given machine learning problem, there might be many models that explain the data almost equally well. However, most learning algorithms return only one of these models, leaving practitioners with no practical way to explore alternative models that might have desirable properties beyond what could be expressed by a loss function. The

Identifiers

PMID37786624
PMCPMC10544768

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.