Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37786611›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in immunology2023

Revalidation of the ATTRACTION-4 study in a real-world setting: a multicenter, retrospective propensity score matching study in China.

Yuhong Dai, Yongqing Liu, Zhimin Gong, Lilin He, Lei Wang, Wenjie Yang, Ping Qiu, Fangyuan Zhang, Xianglin Yuan, Henghui Cheng and 1 more

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in immunology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Yuhong DaiDepartment of Oncology, Tongji Hospital Affiliated to Tongji Medical College of Huazhong University of Science & Technology, Wuhan, Hubei, China.
Yongqing LiuDepartment of Oncology, Tongji Hospital Affiliated to Tongji Medical College of Huazhong University of Science & Technology, Wuhan, Hubei, China.
Zhimin GongDepartment of Oncology, Xiangyang Central Hospital, Affiliated Hospital of Hubei University of Arts and Science. Institute of Oncology, Hubei University of Arts and Science, Xiangyang, Hubei, China.
Lilin HeDepartment of Oncology, The First People's Hospital of Tianmen, Tianmen, Hubei, China.
Lei WangDepartment of Oncology, Xiangyang Central Hospital, Affiliated Hospital of Hubei University of Arts and Science. Institute of Oncology, Hubei University of Arts and Science, Xiangyang, Hubei, China.
Wenjie YangDepartment of Oncology, The First People's Hospital of Tianmen, Tianmen, Hubei, China.
Ping QiuDepartment of Oncology, Jingzhou Central Hospital, Jingzhou, Hubei, China.
Fangyuan ZhangDepartment of Oncology, Tongji Hospital Affiliated to Tongji Medical College of Huazhong University of Science & Technology, Wuhan, Hubei, China.
Xianglin YuanDepartment of Oncology, Tongji Hospital Affiliated to Tongji Medical College of Huazhong University of Science & Technology, Wuhan, Hubei, China.
Henghui ChengInstitution of Pathology, Tongji Hospital Affiliated to Tongji Medical College of Huazhong University of Science & Technology, Wuhan, Hubei, China.
Hong QiuDepartment of Oncology, Tongji Hospital Affiliated to Tongji Medical College of Huazhong University of Science & Technology, Wuhan, Hubei, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Immune-checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) combined with chemotherapy have been successfully used in clinical trials to treat advanced gastric cancer. However, the efficacy and safety of first-line immunotherapy combined with chemotherapy in Chinese patients are unknown. Methods: This multicenter retrospective study included patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor-2 (HER-2) negative advanced gastric cancer treated with first-line chemotherapy or chemotherapy with an ICI between January 2019 and December 2022. Propensity score matching was used to compare progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival, objective response rates, and adverse reactions between cohorts. Results: After propensity score matching, 138 patients, who had balanced baseline characteristics, were included in the chemotherapy and combination treatment groups. The median follow-up duration was 16.90 months, and the median PFS was 8.53 months (95% confidence interval [CI] 7.77-9.28) in the combination treatment group and 5.97 months (95% CI 4.56-7.37) in the chemotherapy group. The median survival duration was 17.05 months (95% CI 14.18-19.92) in the combination treatment group and 16.46 months (95% CI 12.99-19.93) in the chemotherapy group. The PFS subgroup analysis revealed that age ≥65 years, women, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 1, non-signet ring cell carcinoma, esophagogastric junction, liver metastasis, peritoneal metastasis, no massive ascites, only one metastatic organ, and combined platinum-based chemotherapy correlated with treatment benefit. The incidences of adverse events above grade 3 were comparable between groups. Conclusions: Our study confirmed the ATTRACTION-4 trial results. Compared with chemotherapy, first-line ICIs combined with chemotherapy prolonged PFS but did not improve overall survival in patients with HER-2-negative advanced gastric cancer.

Indexed as

Stomach NeoplasmsAgedAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsFemaleHumansProgression-Free SurvivalPropensity ScoreRetrospective Studiesadvanced gastric cancerimmune checkpoint inhibitorsoverall survivalprogression free survivalpropensity score matching

Identifiers

PMID37786611
PMCPMC10541969

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.