ReviewTherapeutic advances in medical oncology2023
Neoadjuvant endocrine therapy in ER-positive breast cancer: evolution, indication, and tailored treatment strategy.
Review in Therapeutic advances in medical oncology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Can neoadjuvant endocrine therapy de-escalate surgery in luminal breast cancer? A four-year retrospective study from a single referral center.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Article
- Recent Advances (2020-2025) in Estrogen and ER-Positive Breast Cancer: Receptor Signaling, Tumor Microenvironment, Endocrine Therapy Resistance and Innovative Treatment Strategies-A Comprehensive Review.Cancer management and research · 2026Review
- Dalpiciclib plus aromatase inhibitor versus neoadjuvant chemotherapy for ER-positive, HER2-negative breast cancer.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Article
- Strategies for the treatment of hormone receptor-positive HER2-low breast cancer based on clinical practice: a round table discussion.Translational breast cancer research : a journal focusing on translational research in breast cancer · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In recent years, endocrine therapy (ET), an effective systemic treatment for the management of estrogen receptor (ER)-positive breast cancers, has regained interest as a neoadjuvant therapy based on evidence that ET can fulfill the aim of neoadjuvant systemic treatment for tumor shrinkage as well as elucidate important clinical information on endocrine sensitivity that enables the prognostication of patients. Moreover, neoadjuvant endocrine therapy (NET) potentially provides an opportunity for early assessment of the clinical efficacy of novel agents. Furthermore, recently reported trials have generated evidence for a more tailored approach for perioperative management of ER-positive breast cancer using clinical and molecular biomarkers, and this has provided a rationale that enables the broadening of clinical indications for NET. This review discusses the current evidence for NET, the evolution of NET trials, clinical indications, and NET-based treatment strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.