Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37786421›Full record

ReviewIbrain2022

Progress in the efficacy and mechanism of spinal cord stimulation in neuropathological pain.

Shun-Lian Li, Jing Li, Hui-Chan Xu, Yu-Cong Liu, Ting-Ting Yang, Hao Yuan

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Ibrain, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Spinal cord stimulation for the treatment of phantom limb pain: A case report and literature review.Zhong nan da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Central South University. Medical sciences · 2025
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Machine Learning in Spinal Cord Stimulation for Chronic Pain.Operative neurosurgery (Hagerstown, Md.) · 2023
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Shun-Lian LiDepartment of Anesthesia Zunyi Medical University Zunyi Guizhou China.ORCID 0000-0003-0615-7220
Jing LiDepartment of Anesthesia Zunyi Medical University Zunyi Guizhou China.
Hui-Chan XuDepartment of Anesthesia Zunyi Medical University Zunyi Guizhou China.ORCID 0000-0002-9402-6310
Yu-Cong LiuDepartment of Anesthesia Zunyi Medical University Zunyi Guizhou China.ORCID 0000-0001-8511-8515
Ting-Ting YangDepartment of Anesthesia Zunyi Medical University Zunyi Guizhou China.ORCID 0000-0002-0440-2344
Hao YuanSchool of Basic Medicine Kunming Medical University Kunming Yunnan China.
Zunyi Medical University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Neuropathic pain (NP) is a long-term recurrent disease caused by somatosensory nervous system injury, with spontaneous pain, hyperalgesia, ectopic pain, and paresthesia as the main clinical manifestations. It adversely affects patients' quality of life. NP treatments often include medication, physical therapy, and invasive therapy; the first two therapies are generally ineffective for some NP patients. These patients sometimes rely on invasive therapy to alleviate pain. Spinal cord stimulation (SCS) is a very effective therapeutic method. SCS is a neuroregulatory method that involves placing the electrodes on the corresponding painful spinal cords. Pain is greatly alleviated after SCS. SCS has been proven to be an effective therapeutic method for the treatment of neurological pain. Furthermore, SCS provides a feasible approach for patients with unsuccessful drug treatment. This paper reviews the relevant literature of spinal cord electrical stimulation, focusing on the mechanism of action, clinical application, clinical efficacy and technical progress of spinal cord electrical stimulation. SCS is widely used in the treatment of NP diseases such as postherpetic neuralgia, back surgery failure syndrome, and phantom limb pain. With advancements in science and technology, tremendous progress has also been made in the spinal cord electrical stimulation method and good momentum has been maintained.

Indexed as

efficacyneuropathological painprogress of mechanismspinal cord stimulation

Identifiers

PMID37786421
PMCPMC10529196
OpenAlexW4214912126

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.