Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37784200›Full record

ArticleImplementation science : IS2023

Community-engaged optimization of COVID-19 rapid evaluation and testing experiences: roll-out implementation optimization trial.

Nicole A Stadnick, Louise C Laurent, Kelli L Cain, Marva Seifert, Maria Linda Burola, Linda Salgin, Paul Watson, William Oswald, Fatima A Munoz, Sharon F Velasquez and 3 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Implementation science : IS, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05894655 (CO-CREATE-Ex), which is not on this map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
5.7field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05894655 nacompletednot on this map

CO-CREATE-Ex: Community-engaged Optimization of COVID-19 Rapid Evaluation And TEsting Experiences

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of California, San DiegoRan2023 to 2025Enrolled6,527ConditionsCOVID-19, COVID-19 PandemicArmsCOVID-19 walk-up, on-site testing strategy, Community Health Worker (CHW) leading testing navigation and general preventive care reminders, No-cost self-testing kit vending machines
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. A Co-Created, Community-Informed Model for Electric Vehicle Adoption in Disadvantaged Communities.Transportation research. Part D, Transport and environment · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 6 institutions in 2 countries.

Nicole A StadnickUniversity of California San Diego Altman Clinical and Translational Research Institute Dissemination and Implementation Science Center, La Jolla, CA, USA. nstadnic@health.ucsd.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6520-2920
Louise C LaurentDepartment of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Sciences, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA.
Kelli L CainHerbert Wertheim School of Public Health and Human Longevity Science, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA.
Marva SeifertDepartment of Medicine, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA.
Maria Linda BurolaDepartment of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Sciences, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA.
Linda SalginSan Ysidro Health, San Diego, CA, USA.
Paul WatsonThe Global Action Research Center, San Diego, CA, USA.
William OswaldThe Global Action Research Center, San Diego, CA, USA.
Fatima A MunozSan Ysidro Health, San Diego, CA, USA.
Sharon F VelasquezSan Ysidro Health, San Diego, CA, USA.
Justin D SmithDepartment of Population Health Sciences, Division of Health System Innovation and Research, Spencer Fox Eccles School of Medicine, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.
Jingjing ZouHerbert Wertheim School of Public Health and Human Longevity Science, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA.
Borsika A RabinUniversity of California San Diego Altman Clinical and Translational Research Institute Dissemination and Implementation Science Center, La Jolla, CA, USA.
University of California San Diego · USCenter for Effective Global Action · USSan Ysidro Health · USSan Diego State University · USUC San Diego Health System · USUniversity of Utah · US

Funding

CTSA UM1 Program at University of UtahUM1TR004409 · NCATS · UTAH STATE HIGHER EDUCATION SYSTEM--UNIVERSITY OF UTAH · PI RACHEL HESS, Jennifer Juhl Majersik · 2023 to 2026
$21.9M
CO-CREATE-Ex: Community-engaged Optimization of COVID-19 Rapid Evaluation And TEsting ExperiencesU01MD018308 · NIMHD · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI LAURENT, LOUISE CHANG, RABIN, ADRIENN BORSIKA · 2023 to 2023
$2.0M
NCATS NIH HHS UM1 TR004409NIH HHS U01MD018308NIMHD NIH HHS U01 MD018308
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThere continues to be a need for COVID-19 testing that is pragmatic, community-centered, and sustainable. This study will refine and test implementation strategies prioritized by community partners: (1) walk-up no-cost testing, (2) community health worker (promotores)-facilitated testing and preventive care counseling, (3) vending machines that dispense no-cost, self-testing kits.

methodsA co-designed Theory of Change from an earlier study phase and the Practical, Robust Implementation and Sustainment Model (PRISM) will guide the study design, measures selection, and evaluation. The first aim is to refine and operationalize a multi-component implementation strategy bundle and outcome measures for COVID-19 testing. A Community and Scientific Advisory Board (CSAB) will be established and include community members, clinical providers/staff from the partnering Federally Qualified Health Center (FQHC), public health researchers, policymakers, and a county health department ambassador. Engagement of CSAB members will be assessed through structured ethnography and a survey about the quality and quantity of engagement practices. The second aim is to implement and evaluate the impact of the implementation strategy bundle to optimize COVID-19 testing in communities using a roll-out implementation optimization (ROIO) design. Seven thousand and five hundred community members will be enrolled across four FQHC clinics over 18 months. Participants will be invited to complete an electronic survey about their demographics, health, and COVID-19 testing results and experiences. CSAB members and clinic partners will participate in PRISM fit and determinant assessments prior to each clinic rollout and post-trial. Interviews will be conducted with 60 community participants and 12 providers/staff following a 3-month rollout period at each clinic, inquiring about their experiences with the implementation strategies. Quantitative data will be analyzed using hierarchical multilevel models to determine the impact of implementation strategies. Qualitative data will be analyzed using rapid qualitative approaches to summarize implementation experiences and identify necessary changes prior to subsequent rollouts. A matrix approach will be used to triangulate data from quantitative and qualitative sources based on PRISM domains. DISCUSSION: This is one of the first pragmatic implementation trials to use a ROIO design and aims to co-create a sustainable and equitable COVID-19 testing program. Findings are likely to generalize to other public health prevention efforts.

trial registrationNCT05894655 March 2, 2023.

Indexed as

COVID-19COVID-19 TestingAmbulatory Care FacilitiesCounselingHumansPublic HealthCOVID-19Health equityImplementation sciencePromotoresRE-AIM frameworkRoll out implementation optimization designTestingUnderserved communities

Identifiers

PMID37784200
PMCPMC10544564
OpenAlexW4387259014

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.