Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37784106›Full record

ArticleJournal of translational medicine2023

Preoperative fluorescence in situ hybridization analysis as a predictor of tumor recurrence in patients with non-muscle invasive bladder cancer: a bi-institutional study.

Junjiong Zheng, Sihong Lu, Yi Huang, Xu Chen, Jie Zhang, Yuhui Yao, Jinhua Cai, Jieying Wu, Jianqiu Kong, Tianxin Lin

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of translational medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Junjiong Zheng *Department of Urology, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Malignant Tumor Epigenetics and Gene Regulation, Sun Yat-Sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Urological Diseases, 107 Yan Jiang West Road, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China.
Sihong Lu *Department of Urology, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Malignant Tumor Epigenetics and Gene Regulation, Sun Yat-Sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Urological Diseases, 107 Yan Jiang West Road, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China.
Yi HuangDepartment of Urology, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Malignant Tumor Epigenetics and Gene Regulation, Sun Yat-Sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Urological Diseases, 107 Yan Jiang West Road, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China.
Xu ChenDepartment of Urology, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Malignant Tumor Epigenetics and Gene Regulation, Sun Yat-Sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Urological Diseases, 107 Yan Jiang West Road, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China.
Jie ZhangDepartment of Urology, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Malignant Tumor Epigenetics and Gene Regulation, Sun Yat-Sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Urological Diseases, 107 Yan Jiang West Road, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China.
Yuhui YaoDepartment of Urology, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Malignant Tumor Epigenetics and Gene Regulation, Sun Yat-Sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Urological Diseases, 107 Yan Jiang West Road, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China.
Jinhua CaiDepartment of Neurology, Sun Yat-Sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University, 107 Yan Jiang West Road, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China.
Jieying WuDepartment of Urology, the Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University, No. 600 Tianhe Road, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China. wujying@mail.sysu.edu.cn.
Jianqiu KongDepartment of Urology, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Malignant Tumor Epigenetics and Gene Regulation, Sun Yat-Sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Urological Diseases, 107 Yan Jiang West Road, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China. kongjq5@mail.sysu.edu.cn.
Tianxin LinDepartment of Urology, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Malignant Tumor Epigenetics and Gene Regulation, Sun Yat-Sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Urological Diseases, 107 Yan Jiang West Road, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China. lintx@mail.sysu.edu.cn.
Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital · CNSun Yat-sen University · CNThird Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundNon-muscle invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) is known for its elevated recurrence rate, necessitating an enhancement in the current risk stratification for recurrence. The urine-based fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) assay has emerged as a noninvasive auxiliary tool for detecting bladder cancer. The aim of this study was to explore the potential relationship between the preoperative FISH assay and recurrence, and to develop a FISH-clinical nomogram for predicting the recurrence-free survival (RFS) in NMIBC patients.

methodsIn total, 332 eligible patients were enrolled from two hospitals. The SYSMH cohort was randomly assigned to the training set (n = 168) and the validation set I (n = 72) at a ratio of 7:3, while the SYSUTH cohort was allocated to the validation set II (n = 92). The correlation between the preoperative FISH assay and recurrence was determined through the Cox regression analysis. The least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) Cox regression algorithm was used for model construction. The performance of the model was assessed by its discrimination, calibration, and clinical usefulness.

resultsWe uncovered that chromosome 7 aneuploidy, p16 locus loss, number of the positive FISH sites, and the FISH test result were significantly associated with tumor recurrence. Then, a FISH-clinical nomogram incorporating the FISH test result, T stage, associated CIS, tumor grade, and tumor status was developed. It showed favorable calibration and discrimination with a C-index of 0.683 (95%CI, 0.611-0.756) in the training set, which was confirmed in the validation set I and validation set II with C-indexes of 0.665 (95%CI, 0.565-0.765) and 0.778 (95%CI, 0.665-0.891), respectively. Decision curve analysis revealed the clinical usefulness of the nomogram. Moreover, our proposed nomogram significantly outperformed the guideline-recommended EORTC and CUETO scoring models.

conclusionOur study confirmed the prognostic value of the preoperative FISH assay and proposed a FISH-clinical nomogram to predict RFS in NMIBC patients. Our nomogram can serve as a more precise tool for recurrence risk stratification, which may optimize disease management in bladder cancer and improve patient prognosis.

Indexed as

Non-Muscle Invasive Bladder NeoplasmsUrinary Bladder NeoplasmsHumansIn Situ Hybridization, FluorescenceNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalPrognosisRetrospective StudiesFluorescence in situ hybridizationNomogramNon-muscle invasive bladder cancerRecurrence

Identifiers

PMID37784106
PMCPMC10546664
OpenAlexW4387267665

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.