Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37784101›Full record

ArticleBMC health services research2023

The role of primary care during the pandemic: shared experiences from providers in five European countries.

Markus Kraus, Christoph Stegner, Miriam Reiss, Monika Riedel, Anne Sofie Børsch, Karsten Vrangbaek, Morgane Michel, Kathleen Turmaine, Borbála Cseh, Csaba László Dózsa and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC health services research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Markus Kraus *Institute for Advanced Studies (IHS), Josefstädter Straße 39, Vienna, 1080, Austria. kraus@ihs.ac.at.
Christoph Stegner *Institute for Advanced Studies (IHS), Josefstädter Straße 39, Vienna, 1080, Austria.
Miriam ReissInstitute for Advanced Studies (IHS), Josefstädter Straße 39, Vienna, 1080, Austria.
Monika RiedelInstitute for Advanced Studies (IHS), Josefstädter Straße 39, Vienna, 1080, Austria.
Anne Sofie BørschUniversity of Copenhagen, Øster Farimagsgade 5, Copenhagen K, 1353, Denmark.
Karsten VrangbaekUniversity of Copenhagen, Øster Farimagsgade 5, Copenhagen K, 1353, Denmark.
Morgane MichelUniversité Paris Cité, ECEVE, UMR 1123, 10 avenue de Verdun, Inserm, Paris, 75010, France.
Kathleen TurmaineUniversité Paris Cité, ECEVE, UMR 1123, 10 avenue de Verdun, Inserm, Paris, 75010, France.
Borbála CsehUniversity of Miskolc, Egyetem út 1, Miskolc-Egyetemváros, 3515, Hungary.
Csaba László DózsaUniversity of Miskolc, Egyetem út 1, Miskolc-Egyetemváros, 3515, Hungary.
Roberto DandiLuiss Business School, Via Nomentana 216, Roma, 00162, RM, Italy.
Angelo Rossi MoriInstitute for Research on Population and Social Policies, Via Palestro 32, Roma, 00185, Italy.
Thomas Czypionka *Institute for Advanced Studies (IHS), Josefstädter Straße 39, Vienna, 1080, Austria.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe COVID-19 pandemic necessitated wide-ranging adaptations to the organisation of health systems, and primary care is no exception. This article aims to collate insights on the role of primary care during the pandemic. The gained knowledge helps to increase pandemic preparedness and resilience.

methodsThe role of primary care during the pandemic in five European countries (Austria, Denmark, France, Hungary, Italy) was investigated using a qualitative approach, namely case study, based on document analysis and semi-structured interviews. In total, 31 interviews were conducted with primary care providers between June and August 2022. The five country case studies were subjected to an overarching analysis focusing on successful strategies as well as gaps and failures regarding pandemic management in primary care.

resultsPrimary care providers identified disruptions to service delivery as a major challenge emerging from the pandemic which led to a widespread adoption of telehealth. Despite the rapid increase in telehealth usage and efforts of primary care providers to organise face-to-face care delivery in a safe way, some patient groups were particularly affected by disruptions in service delivery. Moreover, primary care providers perceived a substantial propagation of misinformation about COVID-19 and vaccines among the population, which also threatened patient-physician relationships. At the same time, primary care providers faced an increased workload, had to work with insufficient personal protective equipment and were provided incongruous guidelines from public authorities. There was a consensus among primary care providers that they were mostly sidelined by public health policy in the context of pandemic management. Primary care providers tackled these problems through a diverse set of measures including home visits, implementing infection control measures, refurbishing used masks, holding internal meetings and relying on their own experiences as well as information shared by colleagues.

conclusionPrimary care providers were neither well prepared nor the focus of initial policy making. However, they implemented creative solutions to the problems they faced and applying the learnings from the pandemic could help in increasing the resilience of primary care. Attributes of an integrated health system with a strong primary care component proved beneficial in addressing immediate effects of the pandemic.

Indexed as

COVID-19PandemicsAustriaEuropeHumansPrimary Health CareCOVID-19Pandemic preparednessPrimary careResilienceService delivery

Identifiers

PMID37784101
PMCPMC10546726

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.