Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37784086›Full record

ArticleBMC public health2023

Rural libraries implementing walking groups or walking groups plus civic engagement for walkability in rural communities: a comparative effectiveness trial study protocol.

Cynthia K Perry, Rebecca Seguin-Fowler, Jay E Maddock, Noah Lenstra, Nathan F Dieckmann, Jessica Currier, Elena Andreyeva, Jim Winkle, Stewart G Trost

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in BMC public health, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05677906 (Rural Libraries Promoting Walking and Walkability in Their Rural Communities), which is not on this map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05677906 phase1 / phase2unknown statusnot on this map

Rural Libraries Promoting Walking and Walkability in Their Rural Communities

TypeinterventionalSponsorOregon Health and Science UniversityRan2023 to 2025Enrolled331ConditionsPhysical ActivityArmsWalking only (Step It Up!), Combined (Step It Up! plus Civic Engagement)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Is Walk Score a useful tool for measuring walkability in rural communities?The Journal of rural health : official journal of the American Rural Health Association and the National Rural Health Care Association · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Cynthia K PerryOregon Health & Science University School of Nursing, 3455 SW US Veterans Hospital Rd, Portland, OR, 97239, USA. perryci@ohsu.edu.
Rebecca Seguin-FowlerTexas A & M University Institute for Advancing Health through Agriculture, 1500 Research Parkway, Centeq Building B, College Station, TX, 77845, USA.
Jay E MaddockTexas A & M University School of Public Health, 1266 TAMU, College Station, TX, 77843, USA.
Noah LenstraUniversity North Carolina Greensboro School of Education, 1300 Spring Garden St, Greensboro, NC, 27412, USA.
Nathan F DieckmannOregon Health & Science University School of Nursing, 3455 SW US Veterans Hospital Rd, Portland, OR, 97239, USA.
Jessica CurrierKnight Cancer Institute, Division of Oncological Sciences, Oregon Health & Science University, 2720 S. Moody Ave, Portland, OR, 97201, USA.
Elena AndreyevaTexas A & M University, 212 Adriance Lab Rd, College Station, TX, 77843, USA.
Jim WinkleOregon Health & Science University School of Nursing, 3455 SW US Veterans Hospital Rd, Portland, OR, 97239, USA.
Stewart G TrostSchool of Human Movement and Nutrition Sciences, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Qld, 4072, Australia.
Oregon Health & Science University · USTexas A&M University · USCenter for Advancing Health · USThe University of Queensland · AUUniversity of North Carolina at Greensboro · US

Funding

Rural Libraries Promoting Walking and Walkability in Their Rural CommunitiesR01NR020368 · NINR · OREGON HEALTH & SCIENCE UNIVERSITY · PI PERRY, CYNTHIA KAY, SEGUIN-FOWLER, REBECCA ANNE · 2022 to 2025
$2.7M
NINR NIH HHS R01 NR020368
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRural residents generally lack adequate physical activity to benefit health and reduce disparities in chronic diseases, such as cardiovascular disease and certain cancers. The Socioecological Model describes physical activity as involving a dynamic and reciprocal interaction between individual, social, and community factors. Community group-based walking programs and civic engagement interventions aimed at enhancing physical activity have been successful in rural communities but have not targeted all three socioecological levels. Public libraries can act as innovative public health partners in rural communities. However, challenges remain because rural libraries often lack the capacity to implement evidence-based health promotion programming. The goals of this study are (1) build the capacity for rural libraries to implement evidence-based health promotion programs, (2) compare changes in physical activity between a group-based walking program and a combined group-based walking and civic engagement program with rural residents, and (3) conduct an implementation evaluation.

methodsWe will conduct a comparative effectiveness study of a group-based walking (standard approach) versus a group-based walking plus civic engagement program (combined approach) aimed at enhancing walkability to increase physical activity among rural adults. Key mediators between the program effects and change in outcomes will also be identified. Finally, we will evaluate program implementation, conduct a cost effectiveness evaluation, and use a positive deviance analysis to understand experiences of high and low changers on key outcomes. Twenty towns will be matched and randomized to one of the two conditions and our aim is to enroll a total of 350-400 rural residents (15-20 per town). Study outcomes will be assessed at baseline, and 6, 12, and 24 months. DISCUSSION: This study will build the capacity of rural libraries to implement evidence-based walking programs as well as other health promotion programs in their communities. The study results will answer questions regarding the relative effectiveness and cost effectiveness of two multilevel physical activity interventions targeting rural communities. We will learn what works and how these multilevel interventions can be implemented in rural populations.

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT05677906.

Indexed as

Rural PopulationWalkingAdultExerciseHealth BehaviorHealth PromotionHumansRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicCivic engagementComparative effectiveness trialPhysical activityRuralWalking

Identifiers

PMID37784086
PMCPMC10544451
OpenAlexW4387293470

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.