ArticlePharmaceutical research2024
Development and Validation of Discriminatory In-vitro Release Method for Intramammary Drug Product.
Article in Pharmaceutical research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Initial Exploration on the Application of the MoCMC Approach for Determining In Vitro Product Comparability.Pharmaceutical research · 2026Article
- Development and Validation of Matrix of Chemistry, Manufacturing, and Control (MoCMC) System for Intramammary Drug Products (IMM).Pharmaceutical research · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
purposeIntramammary (IMM) formulations are locally acting and delivered intracisternally into the udder. No pharmacopeial in-vitro release method is available to differentiate between the IMM formulations. Our research aim is to develop in-vitro release methods that discriminate different IMM formulations (SPECTRAMAST® LC and in-house formulations). METHODOLOGY: Different in-house formulations were developed to simulate SPECTRAMAST® LC generics. SPECTRAMAST® LC and the in-house formulations were characterized for physicochemical attributes, such as particle size, rheology, drug content, sedimentation rate, and flocculation rate. The in-vitro release method was optimized by evaluating drug release using USP apparatuses 1, 2 (with and without enhancer/customized cells), and 4. Various test parameters, including medium effect (whole homogenized bovine milk versus aqueous buffer), medium volume (200-900 mL), and rotational speed (50-200 rpm) were investigated.
resultsTwo potential in-vitro systems can be used as discriminatory methods for IMM formulations: USP apparatus 2 with the IMM formulation loaded into two containers a) customized formulation container (83.1 cm in height and 56.4 cm in width) or b) enhancer cells with their top adapted with mesh #40 (rotation speed:125 rpm and 900 mL of whole homogenized bovine milk). The release profile of SPECTRAMAST® LC at 1 h (99.8%) was not significantly different from formulations with similar physicochemical characteristics F-01 (99.1%) and F-02 (100.5%). Formulation with different physicochemical characteristics F-03 (44.3%) and F-04 (57.2%) showed slower release (1 h) than SPECTRAMAST® LC (98.8%).
conclusionThe developed in-vitro release methods can be used as a potential tool for in-vitro comparability evaluations for IMM formulations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.