Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37783860›Full record

ReviewNature reviews. Immunology2024

Challenges in developing personalized neoantigen cancer vaccines.

Peter D Katsikis, Ken J Ishii, Christopher Schliehe

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Nature reviews. Immunology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 156 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
156citing papers in PubMed
33.4field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

156 citing papers in PubMed, 204 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review

96 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Peter D KatsikisDepartment of Immunology, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands. p.katsikis@erasmusmc.nl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7690-5218
Ken J IshiiDivision of Vaccine Science, Department of Microbiology and Immunology, The Institute of Medical Science, The University of Tokyo (IMSUT), Tokyo, Japan.
Christopher SchlieheDepartment of Immunology, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1923-8620
Erasmus MC · NLThe University of Tokyo · JP

Funding

Investigating PROTAC-mediated antigen degradation as a novel strategy to enhance cytotoxic T-cell responses against cancer in vivo.R21CA274064 · NCI · ERASMUS MEDICAL CENTER · PI SCHLIEHE, CHRISTOPHER · 2022 to 2022
$278k
NCI NIH HHS R21 CA274064
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The recent success of cancer immunotherapies has highlighted the benefit of harnessing the immune system for cancer treatment. Vaccines have a long history of promoting immunity to pathogens and, consequently, vaccines targeting cancer neoantigens have been championed as a tool to direct and amplify immune responses against tumours while sparing healthy tissue. In recent years, extensive preclinical research and more than one hundred clinical trials have tested different strategies of neoantigen discovery and vaccine formulations. However, despite the enthusiasm for neoantigen vaccines, proof of unequivocal efficacy has remained beyond reach for the majority of clinical trials. In this Review, we focus on the key obstacles pertaining to vaccine design and tumour environment that remain to be overcome in order to unleash the true potential of neoantigen vaccines in cancer therapy.

Indexed as

Cancer VaccinesNeoplasmsAntigens, NeoplasmHumansImmune SystemImmunotherapyAntigens, NeoplasmCancer Vaccines

Identifiers

PMID37783860
PMCPMC12001822
OpenAlexW4387256229

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.