Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37783820›Full record

ReviewNature reviews. Neuroscience2023

Is song processing distinct and special in the auditory cortex?

Ilana Harris, Efe C Niven, Alex Griffin, Sophie K Scott

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Nature reviews. Neuroscience, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. CoVox: A dataset of contrasting vocalizations.Behavior research methods · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Editorial: The musical brain, volume II.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Ilana HarrisInstitute of Cognitive Neuroscience, University College London, London, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8085-5628
Efe C NivenInstitute of Cognitive Neuroscience, University College London, London, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0008-2687-9013
Alex GriffinDepartment of Psychology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0003-5509-4104
Sophie K ScottInstitute of Cognitive Neuroscience, University College London, London, UK. sophie.scott@ucl.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7510-6297

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Is the singing voice processed distinctively in the human brain? In this Perspective, we discuss what might distinguish song processing from speech processing in light of recent work suggesting that some cortical neuronal populations respond selectively to song and we outline the implications for our understanding of auditory processing. We review the literature regarding the neural and physiological mechanisms of song production and perception and show that this provides evidence for key differences between song and speech processing. We conclude by discussing the significance of the notion that song processing is special in terms of how this might contribute to theories of the neurobiological origins of vocal communication and to our understanding of the neural circuitry underlying sound processing in the human cortex.

Indexed as

Auditory CortexAcoustic StimulationAuditory PerceptionBrainHumansSpeech

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.