Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37783779›Full record

Trial reportScientific reports2023

Moisture mitigation using a vented liner and a vented socket system for individuals with transfemoral amputation.

Surya C Gnyawali, Jeffrey A Denune, Bryce Hockman, Jóna Valgerður Kristjánsdóttir, Margrét Sól Ragnarsdóttir, Lava R Timsina, Subhadip Ghatak, Knut Lechler, Chandan K Sen, Sashwati Roy

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Scientific reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Surya C Gnyawali *McGowan Institute for Regenerative Medicine (MIRM), Department of Surgery, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, USA. scg92@pitt.edu.
Jeffrey A Denune *Indiana Centre for Regenerative Medicine and Engineering (ICRME), Indiana University Health Comprehensive Wound Centre, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA.
Bryce HockmanIndiana Centre for Regenerative Medicine and Engineering (ICRME), Indiana University Health Comprehensive Wound Centre, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA.
Jóna Valgerður KristjánsdóttirÖssur Ehf., R&D, Medical Office, Reykjavik, Iceland.
Margrét Sól RagnarsdóttirÖssur Ehf., R&D, Medical Office, Reykjavik, Iceland.
Lava R TimsinaIndiana Centre for Regenerative Medicine and Engineering (ICRME), Indiana University Health Comprehensive Wound Centre, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA.
Subhadip GhatakMcGowan Institute for Regenerative Medicine (MIRM), Department of Surgery, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Knut LechlerÖssur Ehf., R&D, Medical Office, Reykjavik, Iceland.
Chandan K SenMcGowan Institute for Regenerative Medicine (MIRM), Department of Surgery, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Sashwati RoyMcGowan Institute for Regenerative Medicine (MIRM), Department of Surgery, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, USA. sash.roy@pitt.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sweating and heat buildup at the skin-liner interface is a major challenge for persons with limb loss. Liners made of heat-non-conducting materials may cause sweating of the residual limb and may result in liners slipping off the skin surface especially on a warm day or during high activity, causing skin breakdown and affecting limb health. To address this, we evaluated the efficacy of the vented liner-socket system (VS, Össur) compared to Seal-In silicone liner and non-vented socket (nVS, Össur) in reducing relative humidity (RH) during increased sweat. Nine individuals with limb loss using nVS were randomized to VS or nVS and asked for activity in a 20-min treadmill walk. RH was significantly attenuated (p = 0.0002) and perceived sweating, as reported by prosthesis users, improved (p = 0.028) with VS, patient-reported comprehensive lower limb amputee socket survey (CLASS) outcomes to determine the suspension, stability, and comfort were not significantly different between VS and nVS. There are limited rigorous scientific studies that clearly provide evidence-based guidelines to the prosthetist in the selection of liners from numerous available options. The present study is innovative in clearly establishing objective measures for assessing humidity and temperatures at the skin-liner interface while performing activity. As shown by the measured data and perceived sweat scores provided by the subjects based on their daily experience, this study provided clear evidence establishing relative humidity at the skin-liner interface is reduced with the use of a vented liner-socket system when compared to a similar non-vented system.

Indexed as

AmputeesArtificial LimbsAmputation StumpsAmputation, SurgicalHumansLower ExtremityProsthesis DesignTibia

Identifiers

PMID37783779
PMCPMC10545693

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.