Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37783707›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2023

Preliminary in-silico analysis of vascular graft implantation configuration and surface modification.

Ray Prather, Yashar Pourmoghadam, Joseph Fadhli, Faris Al-Mousily, Kamal Pourmoghadam

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 46% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Ray PratherDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, University of Central Florida, Orlando, FL, USA.
Yashar PourmoghadamDepartment of Molecular and Cell Biology, University of California Berkeley, Berkeley, CA, USA. yasharkp@berkeley.edu.
Joseph FadhliDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, University of Central Florida, Orlando, FL, USA.
Faris Al-MousilyDepartment of Medicine, College of Medicine, University of Central Florida, Orlando, FL, USA.
Kamal PourmoghadamDepartment of Surgery, College of Medicine, University of Central Florida, Orlando, FL, USA.
University of Central Florida · USUniversity of California, Berkeley · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Vascular grafts are used to reconstruct congenital cardiac anomalies, redirect flow, and offer vascular access. Donor tissue, synthetic, or more recently tissue-engineered vascular grafts each carry limitations spanning compatibility, availability, durability and cost. Synthetic and tissue-engineered grafts offer the advantage of design optimization using in-silico or in-vitro modeling techniques. We focus on an in-silico parametric study to evaluate implantation configuration alternatives and surface finishing impact of a novel silicon-lined vascular graft. The model consists of a synthetic 3D-generic model of a graft connecting the internal carotid artery to the jugular vein. The flow is assumed unsteady, incompressible, and blood is modeled as a non-Newtonian fluid. A comparison of detached eddy turbulence and laminar modeling to determine the required accuracy needed found mild differences mainly dictated by the roughness level. The conduit walls are modeled as non-compliant and fixed. The shunt configurations considered, are straight and curved with varied surface roughness. Following a grid convergence study, two shunt configurations are analyzed to better understand flow distribution, peak shear locations, stagnation regions and eddy formation. The curved shunt was found to have lower peak and mean wall-shear stress, while resulting in lower flow power system and decreased power loss across the graft. The curved smooth surface shunt shows lower peak and mean wall-shear stress and lower power loss when compared to the straight shunt.

Indexed as

Arteriovenous Shunt, SurgicalBlood Vessel Prosthesis ImplantationBlood Vessel ProsthesisCarotid Artery, InternalJugular Veins

Identifiers

PMID37783707
PMCPMC10545661
OpenAlexW4387253815

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.