ArticleScientific reports2023
Preliminary in-silico analysis of vascular graft implantation configuration and surface modification.
Article in Scientific reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Vascular grafts are used to reconstruct congenital cardiac anomalies, redirect flow, and offer vascular access. Donor tissue, synthetic, or more recently tissue-engineered vascular grafts each carry limitations spanning compatibility, availability, durability and cost. Synthetic and tissue-engineered grafts offer the advantage of design optimization using in-silico or in-vitro modeling techniques. We focus on an in-silico parametric study to evaluate implantation configuration alternatives and surface finishing impact of a novel silicon-lined vascular graft. The model consists of a synthetic 3D-generic model of a graft connecting the internal carotid artery to the jugular vein. The flow is assumed unsteady, incompressible, and blood is modeled as a non-Newtonian fluid. A comparison of detached eddy turbulence and laminar modeling to determine the required accuracy needed found mild differences mainly dictated by the roughness level. The conduit walls are modeled as non-compliant and fixed. The shunt configurations considered, are straight and curved with varied surface roughness. Following a grid convergence study, two shunt configurations are analyzed to better understand flow distribution, peak shear locations, stagnation regions and eddy formation. The curved shunt was found to have lower peak and mean wall-shear stress, while resulting in lower flow power system and decreased power loss across the graft. The curved smooth surface shunt shows lower peak and mean wall-shear stress and lower power loss when compared to the straight shunt.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.