Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37783525›Full record

SynthesisBMJ open quality2023

Do we understand each other when we develop and implement hip fracture models of care? A systematic review with narrative synthesis.

Elizabeth Armstrong, Lara A Harvey, Narelle L Payne, Jing Zhang, Pengpeng Ye, Ian A Harris, Maoyi Tian, Rebecca Q Ivers

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMJ open quality, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Elizabeth ArmstrongSchool of Population Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia elizabeth.armstrong@unsw.edu.au.ORCID 0000-0001-5980-9697
Lara A HarveySchool of Population Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Narelle L PayneFalls, Balance and Injury Research Centre, Neuroscience Research Australia, Randwick, New South Wales, Australia.
Jing ZhangSchool of Population Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Pengpeng YeThe George Institute for Global Health, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Ian A HarrisOrthopaedic Department, Liverpool Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Maoyi TianThe George Institute for Global Health, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Rebecca Q IversSchool of Population Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundA hip fracture in an older person is a devastating injury. It impacts functional mobility, independence and survival. Models of care may provide a means for delivering integrated hip fracture care in less well-resourced settings. The aim of this review was to determine the elements of hip fracture models of care to inform the development of an adaptable model of care for low and middle-income countries (LMICs).

methodsMultiple databases were searched for papers reporting a hip fracture model of care for any part of the patient pathway from injury to rehabilitation. Results were limited to publications from 2000. Titles, abstracts and full texts were screened based on eligibility criteria. Papers were evaluated with an equity lens against eight conceptual criteria adapted from an existing description of a model of care.

results82 papers were included, half of which were published since 2015. Only two papers were from middle-income countries and only two papers were evaluated as reporting all conceptual criteria from the existing description. The most identified criterion was an evidence-informed intervention and the least identified was the inclusion of patient stakeholders.

conclusionInterventions described as models of care for hip fracture are unlikely to include previously described conceptual criteria. They are most likely to be orthogeriatric approaches to service delivery, which is a barrier to their implementation in resource-limited settings. In LMICs, the provision of orthogeriatric competencies by other team members is an area for further investigation.

Indexed as

Hip FracturesAgedHumanshealthcare quality improvementhealth policyhealth services researchhip fractures

Identifiers

PMID37783525
PMCPMC10565304

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.