Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37783481›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of gynecological cancer : official journal of the International Gynecological Cancer Society2023

European multidisciplinary tumor boards support cross-border networking and increase treatment options for patients with rare gynecological tumors.

Ulrika Joneborg, Alice Bergamini, Emelie Wallin, Giorgia Mangili, Olesya Solheim, Gloria Marquina, Antonio Casado, Erik Rokkones, John Coulter, Christianne A R Lok and 10 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of gynecological cancer : official journal of the International Gynecological Cancer Society, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Case Report: Neuropsychological Profile of a Patient With Intravascular Large B-Cell Lymphoma Following Infection and Vaccination.Archives of clinical neuropsychology : the official journal of the National Academy of Neuropsychologists · 2025
    Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors.

Ulrika JoneborgDepartment of Pelvic Cancer, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden ulrika.joneborg@regionstockholm.se.ORCID 0000-0002-1922-0738
Alice BergaminiSan Raffaele Hospital Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Milano, Italy.
Emelie WallinDepartment of Pelvic Cancer, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.
Giorgia MangiliSan Raffaele Hospital Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Milano, Italy.
Olesya SolheimDepartment of Gynecological Oncology, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.ORCID 0000-0003-1936-3453
Gloria MarquinaDepartment of Medical Oncology, Hospital Clinico San Carlos, Madrid, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-8961-9787
Antonio CasadoDepartment of Medicine, Complutense University of Madrid, Madrid, Spain.
Erik RokkonesDepartment of Gynecological Oncology, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
John CoulterDepartment of Gynaecological Oncology, Cork University Hospital, Cork, Ireland.
Christianne A R LokDepartment of Gynecologic Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-8693-7299
Nienke van TrommelDepartment of Gynecologic Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Frédéric AmantDivision of Gynecologic Oncology, KU Leuven University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0002-5452-4905
Pierre-Adrien BolzeHospices Civils de Lyon, Universite Lyon 1 Faculte de Medecine et de Maieutique Lyon-Sud Charles Merieux, Lyon, France.
Jalid SehouliDepartment of Gynecology with Center of Oncological Surgery, Charite Medical Faculty Berlin, Berlin, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-5963-6623
Sileny HanDivision of Gynecologic Oncology, KU Leuven University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0002-7476-3372
Frédéric KridelkaDepartment of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Central University Hospital of Liege, Liege, Belgium.
Frederic GoffinDepartment of Obstetrics and gynecology, Central University Hospital of Liege, Liege, Belgium.
Patricia PautierGustave Roussy Institute, Villejuif, France.
Isabelle Ray-Coquard *Centre Leon Berard, Lyon, France.ORCID 0000-0003-2472-8306
Michael Seckl *Department of Medical Oncology, Imperial College London - Charing Cross Campus, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-4078-2599

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo evaluate outcomes of European cross-border multidisciplinary tumor boards in terms of participation, adherence to treatment recommendations, and access to novel treatment strategies.

methodsThe European reference network for rare gynecological tumors (EURACAN G2 domain) aims to improve the diagnosis, management, and treatment of patients with these cancers. Cross-border multidisciplinary tumor boards were initiated to facilitate intercollegiate clinical discussions across Europe and increase patients' access to specialist treatment recommendations and clinical trials. All G2 healthcare providers were invited to participate in monthly multidisciplinary meetings. Patient data were collected using a standardized form and case summaries were distributed before each meeting. After each tumor board, a meeting summary with treatment recommendations was sent to all participants and the project manager at the coordinating center. The multidisciplinary tumor board format and outcomes were regularly discussed at G2 domain meetings. Anonymized clinical data and treatment recommendations were registered in a prospective database. For this report, clinical data were collected between November 2017 and December 2020 and follow-up data retrieved until May 2021.

resultsDuring the 3-year period, 31 multidisciplinary tumor boards were held with participants from 10 countries and 20 centers. 91 individual patients were discussed between one and six times for a total of 109 case discussions. Follow-up data were retrieved from 64 patients and 80 case discussions. Adherence to treatment recommendations was 99%. Multidisciplinary tumor board recommendations resulted in 11 patients getting access to off-label treatment and one patient being enrolled in a clinical trial in another European country. 14/91 patients were recommended for surveillance only when additional treatment had been considered locally.

conclusionCross-border multidisciplinary tumor boards enable networking and clinical collaboration between healthcare professionals in different countries. Surveillance strategies, off-label drug use, and increased participation in clinical trials are possible benefits to patients with rare gynecological tumors.

Indexed as

Genital Neoplasms, FemaleEuropeFemaleHealth PersonnelHumansOff-Label UseGestational Trophoblastic DiseaseOvarian NeoplasmsSex Cord-Gonadal Stromal TumorsTrophoblastic Neoplasms

Identifiers

PMID37783481
PMCPMC10579460

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.