Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37782783›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2023

Organizational system thinking as a cognitive framework to meet climate targets.

Matteo Burato, Samuel Tang, Vincenzo Vastola, Simone Cenci

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Organizational system thinking as a cognitive framework to meet climate targets.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Matteo BuratoLeonardo Centre on Business for Society, Imperial College Business School, London SW7 2BX, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-8754-5545
Samuel TangInstitute for Sustainable Resources, Bartlett School of Environment, Energy and Resources, University College London, London WC1H 0NN, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-8267-0363
Vincenzo VastolaDepartment of Management, Strategy, and Entrepreneurship, Montpellier Business School, Montpellier 34080, France.ORCID 0000-0001-5062-8347
Simone CenciLeonardo Centre on Business for Society, Imperial College Business School, London SW7 2BX, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-6843-468X
Leonardo (United Kingdom) · GBMontpellier Business School · FRUniversity College London · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

System thinking is a crucial cognitive framework to enable individual pro-environmental behavioral changes. Indeed, a large body of literature has shown a significant and positive association between individuals' system thinking capacities and perceptions of the threat posed by climate change. However, individual behavioral changes play a limited role in addressing climate change compared to large organizations involved in a significantly larger share of economic activities. Do organizations exhibit system thinking capacities? Here, we conjecture that system thinking is a cognitive framework observable at an aggregated group level and, therefore, organizations, not just individuals, can exhibit characteristic levels of system thinking. We conceptualize a definition of organizational system thinking and develop an empirical method to estimate it using a large body of textual data from business organizations. Then, we show that system thinking organizations are more likely to lower emissions and align them with the pathways required to meet the climate targets set by the Paris Agreement. Finally, we discussed the theoretical and policy implication of our study. Overall, our results suggest that system thinking is a relevant organization-level cognitive framework that can help organizations align their emissions with global climate targets.

Indexed as

Climate ChangePolicyCognitionHumansOrganizational CultureParisclimate changeorganizational behaviorsystem thinking

Identifiers

PMID37782783
PMCPMC10576104
OpenAlexW4387245093

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.