ArticlePLoS computational biology2023
Mouse visual cortex as a limited resource system that self-learns an ecologically-general representation.
Article in PLoS computational biology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
27 citing papers in PubMed.
- Perceptual misalignment of texture representations in convolutional neural networks.Journal of vision · 2026Article
- A single computational objective can produce specialization of streams in visual cortex.Nature communications · 2026Article
- Ecological Visual Processing in the Mouse.Annual review of neuroscience · 2026Review
- Hierarchical recurrent temporal prediction as a model of the mammalian dorsal visual pathway.PLoS computational biology · 2026Article
- Nonuniform spike count shared variability in the mouse early visual system.Journal of neurophysiology · 2026Article
- Review
- How 'Neural' is a Neural Foundation Model?ArXiv · 2026Article
- Higher-level spatial prediction in natural vision across mouse visual cortex.PLoS computational biology · 2026Article
- Synthesizing images to map neural networks to the human brain.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- Article
- Article
- Self-supervised predictive learning accounts for cortical layer-specificity.Nature communications · 2025Article
- Exploring internal representations of self-supervised networks: few-shot learning abilities and comparison with human semantics and recognition of objects.Frontiers in computational neuroscience · 2025Article
- Human-like face pareidolia emerges in deep neural networks optimized for face and object recognition.PLoS computational biology · 2025Article
- Review
- Heterogeneous orientation tuning in the primary visual cortex of mice diverges from Gabor-like receptive fields in primates.Cell reports · 2024Article
- Decoding dynamic visual scenes across the brain hierarchy.PLoS computational biology · 2024Article
- Signatures of hierarchical temporal processing in the mouse visual system.PLoS computational biology · 2024Article
- Article
- An analysis of information segregation in parallel streams of a multi-stream convolutional neural network.Scientific reports · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Studies of the mouse visual system have revealed a variety of visual brain areas that are thought to support a multitude of behavioral capacities, ranging from stimulus-reward associations, to goal-directed navigation, and object-centric discriminations. However, an overall understanding of the mouse's visual cortex, and how it supports a range of behaviors, remains unknown. Here, we take a computational approach to help address these questions, providing a high-fidelity quantitative model of mouse visual cortex and identifying key structural and functional principles underlying that model's success. Structurally, we find that a comparatively shallow network structure with a low-resolution input is optimal for modeling mouse visual cortex. Our main finding is functional-that models trained with task-agnostic, self-supervised objective functions based on the concept of contrastive embeddings are much better matches to mouse cortex, than models trained on supervised objectives or alternative self-supervised methods. This result is very much unlike in primates where prior work showed that the two were roughly equivalent, naturally leading us to ask the question of why these self-supervised objectives are better matches than supervised ones in mouse. To this end, we show that the self-supervised, contrastive objective builds a general-purpose visual representation that enables the system to achieve better transfer on out-of-distribution visual scene understanding and reward-based navigation tasks. Our results suggest that mouse visual cortex is a low-resolution, shallow network that makes best use of the mouse's limited resources to create a light-weight, general-purpose visual system-in contrast to the deep, high-resolution, and more categorization-dominated visual system of primates.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.