Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37782338›Full record

ArticleEuropean radiology2024

Radiomics in cone-beam breast CT for the prediction of axillary lymph node metastasis in breast cancer: a multi-center multi-device study.

Yueqiang Zhu, Yue Ma, Zhenzhen Zhai, Aidi Liu, Yafei Wang, Yuwei Zhang, Haijie Li, Mengran Zhao, Peng Han, Lu Yin and 5 more

Open access · greenAbstract readMulticenter Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European radiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.4field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Yueqiang ZhuDepartment of Radiology, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital; National Clinical Research Center for Cancer; Tianjin's Clinical Research Center for Cancer; Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Tianjin; Key Laboratory of Breast Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Tianjin Medical University, Ministry of Education, Huan-Hu-Xi Road, Ti-Yuan-Bei, Hexi District, Tianjin, 300060, China.
Yue MaDepartment of Radiology, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital; National Clinical Research Center for Cancer; Tianjin's Clinical Research Center for Cancer; Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Tianjin; Key Laboratory of Breast Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Tianjin Medical University, Ministry of Education, Huan-Hu-Xi Road, Ti-Yuan-Bei, Hexi District, Tianjin, 300060, China.
Zhenzhen ZhaiDepartment of Radiology, The Fifth Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University, Mei-Hua-Dong Road, Xiangzhou District, Zhuhai, 519000, China.
Aidi LiuDepartment of Radiology, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital; National Clinical Research Center for Cancer; Tianjin's Clinical Research Center for Cancer; Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Tianjin; Key Laboratory of Breast Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Tianjin Medical University, Ministry of Education, Huan-Hu-Xi Road, Ti-Yuan-Bei, Hexi District, Tianjin, 300060, China.
Yafei WangDepartment of Radiology, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital; National Clinical Research Center for Cancer; Tianjin's Clinical Research Center for Cancer; Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Tianjin; Key Laboratory of Breast Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Tianjin Medical University, Ministry of Education, Huan-Hu-Xi Road, Ti-Yuan-Bei, Hexi District, Tianjin, 300060, China.
Yuwei ZhangDepartment of Radiology, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital; National Clinical Research Center for Cancer; Tianjin's Clinical Research Center for Cancer; Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Tianjin; Key Laboratory of Breast Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Tianjin Medical University, Ministry of Education, Huan-Hu-Xi Road, Ti-Yuan-Bei, Hexi District, Tianjin, 300060, China.
Haijie LiDepartment of Radiology, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital; National Clinical Research Center for Cancer; Tianjin's Clinical Research Center for Cancer; Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Tianjin; Key Laboratory of Breast Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Tianjin Medical University, Ministry of Education, Huan-Hu-Xi Road, Ti-Yuan-Bei, Hexi District, Tianjin, 300060, China.
Mengran ZhaoDepartment of Radiology, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital; National Clinical Research Center for Cancer; Tianjin's Clinical Research Center for Cancer; Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Tianjin; Key Laboratory of Breast Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Tianjin Medical University, Ministry of Education, Huan-Hu-Xi Road, Ti-Yuan-Bei, Hexi District, Tianjin, 300060, China.
Peng HanDepartment of Radiology, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital; National Clinical Research Center for Cancer; Tianjin's Clinical Research Center for Cancer; Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Tianjin; Key Laboratory of Breast Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Tianjin Medical University, Ministry of Education, Huan-Hu-Xi Road, Ti-Yuan-Bei, Hexi District, Tianjin, 300060, China.
Lu YinDepartment of Radiology, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital; National Clinical Research Center for Cancer; Tianjin's Clinical Research Center for Cancer; Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Tianjin; Key Laboratory of Breast Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Tianjin Medical University, Ministry of Education, Huan-Hu-Xi Road, Ti-Yuan-Bei, Hexi District, Tianjin, 300060, China.
Ni HeDepartment of Medical Imaging and Image-guided Therapy, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Dong-Feng-Dong Road, Yuexiu District, Guangzhou, 510060, China.
Yaopan WuDepartment of Medical Imaging and Image-guided Therapy, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Dong-Feng-Dong Road, Yuexiu District, Guangzhou, 510060, China.
Ioannis SechopoulosDepartment of Medical Imaging, Radboud University Medical Center, PO Box 9101, Nijmegen, 6500 HB, The Netherlands.
Zhaoxiang YeDepartment of Radiology, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital; National Clinical Research Center for Cancer; Tianjin's Clinical Research Center for Cancer; Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Tianjin; Key Laboratory of Breast Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Tianjin Medical University, Ministry of Education, Huan-Hu-Xi Road, Ti-Yuan-Bei, Hexi District, Tianjin, 300060, China. yezhaoxiang@163.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3157-8393
Marco CaballoDepartment of Medical Imaging, Radboud University Medical Center, PO Box 9101, Nijmegen, 6500 HB, The Netherlands.
Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital · CNRadboud University Nijmegen · NLSun Yat-sen University · CN

Funding

Key Project of Tianjin Medical Industry 16KG130National Key R and D Program of China 2021YFC2500400, 2021YFC2500402, 2017YFC0112600, 2017YFC0112601, 2017YFC0112605National Natural Science Foundation of China 81571671Tianjin Key Medical Discipline (Specialty) Construction Project TJYXZDXK-009ATianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital Fund B2118, B2219Tianjin Science and Technology Major Project 19ZXDBSY00080
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo develop a radiomics model in contrast-enhanced cone-beam breast CT (CE-CBBCT) for preoperative prediction of axillary lymph node (ALN) status and metastatic burden of breast cancer.

methodsTwo hundred and seventy-four patients who underwent CE-CBBCT examination with two scanners between 2012 and 2021 from two institutions were enrolled. The primary tumor was annotated in each patient image, from which 1781 radiomics features were extracted with PyRadiomics. After feature selection, support vector machine models were developed to predict ALN status and metastatic burden. To avoid overfitting on a specific patient subset, 100 randomly stratified splits were made to assign the patients to either training/fine-tuning or test set. Area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of these radiomics models was compared to those obtained when training the models only with clinical features and combined clinical-radiomics descriptors. Ground truth was established by histopathology.

resultsOne hundred and eighteen patients had ALN metastasis (N + (≥ 1)). Of these, 74 had low burden (N + (1~2)) and 44 high burden (N + (≥ 3)). The remaining 156 patients had none (N0). AUC values across the 100 test repeats in predicting ALN status (N0/N + (≥ 1)) were 0.75 ± 0.05 (0.67~0.93, radiomics model), 0.68 ± 0.07 (0.53~0.85, clinical model), and 0.74 ± 0.05 (0.67~0.88, combined model). For metastatic burden prediction (N + (1~2)/N + (≥ 3)), AUC values were 0.65 ± 0.10 (0.50~0.88, radiomics model), 0.55 ± 0.10 (0.40~0.80, clinical model), and 0.64 ± 0.09 (0.50~0.90, combined model), with all the ranges spanning 0.5. In both cases, the radiomics model was significantly better than the clinical model (both p < 0.01) and comparable with the combined model (p = 0.56 and 0.64).

conclusionsRadiomics features of primary tumors could have potential in predicting ALN metastasis in CE-CBBCT imaging. CLINICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT: The findings support potential clinical use of radiomics for predicting axillary lymph node metastasis in breast cancer patients and addressing the limited axilla coverage of cone-beam breast CT. KEY POINTS: • Contrast-enhanced cone-beam breast CT-based radiomics could have potential to predict N0 vs. N + (≥ 1) and, to a limited extent, N + (1~2) vs. N + (≥ 3) from primary tumor, and this could help address the limited axilla coverage, pending future verifications on larger cohorts. • The average AUC of radiomics and combined models was significantly higher than that of clinical models but showed no significant difference between themselves. • Radiomics features descriptive of tumor texture were found informative on axillary lymph node status, highlighting a higher heterogeneity for tumor with positive axillary lymph node.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsAxillaCone-Beam Computed TomographyFemaleHumansLymphatic MetastasisLymph NodesRadiomicsRetrospective StudiesBreast neoplasmsCone-beam computed tomographyLymphatic metastasisMachine learningRadiomics

Identifiers

PMID37782338
OpenAlexW4387241545

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.