Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37782323›Full record

ArticleWorld journal of urology2023

Results from a global multicenter registry of 6193 patients to refine endoscopic anatomical enucleation of the prostate (REAP) by evaluating trends and outcomes and nuances of prostate enucleation in a real-world setting.

Vineet Gauhar, Fernando Gómez Sancha, Dmitry Enikeev, Mario Sofer, Khi Yung Fong, Moisés Rodríguez Socarrás, Dean Elterman, Mallikarjuna Chiruvella, Mohammed Taif Bendigeri, Azimdjon N Tursunkulov and 11 more

Abstract readMulticenter Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in World journal of urology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
5.0field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Observational
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

21 authors at 14 institutions in 10 countries.

Vineet GauharDepartment of Urology, Ng Teng Fong General Hospital, Singapore, Singapore.
Fernando Gómez SanchaDepartment of Urology and Robotic Surgery, ICUA-Clínica CEMTRO, Madrid, Spain.
Dmitry EnikeevDepartment of Urology, Institute for Urology and Reproductive Health, Sechenov University, Moscow, Russian Federation.
Mario SoferDepartment of Urology, Tel-Aviv Sourasky Medical Center, Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel-Aviv University, Tel-Aviv, Israel.
Khi Yung FongYong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.
Moisés Rodríguez SocarrásDepartment of Urology and Robotic Surgery, ICUA-Clínica CEMTRO, Madrid, Spain.
Dean EltermanDivision of Urology, Department of Surgery, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.
Mallikarjuna ChiruvellaDepartment of Urology, Asian Institute of Nephrology and Urology, Hyderabad, TG, India.
Mohammed Taif BendigeriDepartment of Urology, Asian Institute of Nephrology and Urology, Hyderabad, TG, India.
Azimdjon N TursunkulovUrology Division, AkfaMedline Hospital, Tashkent, Uzbekistan.
Abhay MahajanDepartment of Urology, Sai Urology Hospital and MGM Medical College, Aurangabad, India.
Tanuj Paul BhatiaDepartment of Urology, Sarvodaya Hospital and Research Centre, Faridabad, Haryana, India.
Sorokin Nikolai IvanovichDepartment of Urology and Andrology, Lomonosov Moscow State University, Moscow, Russian Federation.
Nariman GadzhievDepartment of Urology, Saint-Petersburg State University Hospital, Saint-Petersburg, Russian Federation.
Lie Kwok YingDepartment of Urology, Ng Teng Fong General Hospital, Singapore, Singapore.
Biligere SarvajitDepartment of Urology, Ng Teng Fong General Hospital, Singapore, Singapore.
Marco DellabellaUrology Unit, IRCCS INRCA, Ancona, Italy.
Vladislav PetovDepartment of Urology, Ng Teng Fong General Hospital, Singapore, Singapore.
Bhaskar Kumar SomaniDepartment of Urology, University Hospitals Southampton NHS Trust, Southampton, UK.
Daniele CastellaniUrology Unit, IRCCS INRCA, Ancona, Italy. castellanidaniele@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7354-9190
Thomas R W HerrmannDepartment of Urology, Kantonspital Frauenfeld, Spital Thurgau AG, Frauenfeld, Switzerland.
Ng Teng Fong General Hospital · SGAsian Institute of Gastroenterology · INClínica Rementería · ESSechenov University · RUCentral Asian University · UZIstituti di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico · ITLomonosov Moscow State University · RUMahatma Gandhi Memorial Medical College · INMarche Polytechnic University · ITNational University of Singapore · SGSpital Thurgau (Switzerland) · CHSt Petersburg University · RUTel Aviv University · ILUniversity Health Network · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo collect a multicentric, global database to assess current preferences and outcomes for endoscopic enucleation of the prostate (EEP).

methodsEndourologists experienced in EEP from across the globe were invited to participate in the creation of this retrospective registry. Surgical procedures were performed between January 2020 and August 2022. INCLUSION CRITERIA: lower urinary tract symptoms not responding to or worsening despite medical therapy and absolute indication for surgery. EXCLUSION CRITERIA: prostate cancer, concomitant lower urinary tract surgery, previous prostate/urethral surgery, pelvic radiotherapy.

resultsTen centers from 7 countries, involving 13 surgeons enrolled 6193 patients. Median age was 68 [62-74] years. 2326 (37.8%) patients had large prostates (> 80 cc). The most popular energy modality was the Holmium laser. The most common technique used for enucleation was the 2-lobe (48.8%). 86.2% of the procedures were performed under spinal anesthesia. Median operation time was 67 [50-95] minutes. Median postoperative catheter time was 2 [1, 3] days. Urinary tract infections were the most reported complications (4.7%) followed by acute urinary retention (4.1%). Post-operative bleeding needing additional intervention was reported in 0.9% of cases. 3 and 12-month follow-up visits showed improvement in symptoms and micturition parameters. Only 8 patients (1.4%) required redo surgery for residual adenoma. Stress urinary incontinence was reported in 53.9% of patients and after 3 months was found to persist in 16.2% of the cohort.

conclusionOur database contributes real-world data to support EEP as a truly well-established global, safe minimally invasive intervention and provides insights for further research.

Indexed as

Lasers, Solid-StateLaser TherapyProstatic HyperplasiaTransurethral Resection of ProstateAgedHumansMaleProstateProstatectomyRetrospective StudiesTreatment OutcomeBenign prostatic hyperplasiaEndoscopic enucleation of the prostateLaser therapyRegistries

Identifiers

PMID37782323
OpenAlexW4387241736

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.