ArticleAnalytical chemistry2023
Accurate Sphingolipid Quantification Reducing Fragmentation Bias by Nonlinear Models.
Article in Analytical chemistry, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Dynamic neutrophil lipidome remodeling during induction of NETosis.Science advances · 2026Article
- New Analytical Technologies to Resolve, Interpret, and Understand Lipid Complexity.Annual review of analytical chemistry (Palo Alto, Calif.) · 2026Review
- Candida auris skin tropism and antifungal resistance are mediated by carbonic anhydrase Nce103.Nature microbiology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Quantitative sphingolipid analysis is crucial for understanding the roles of these bioactive molecules in various physiological and pathological contexts. Molecular sphingolipid species are typically quantified using sphingoid base-derived fragments relative to a class-specific internal standard. However, the commonly employed "one standard per class" strategy fails to account for fragmentation differences presented by the structural diversity of sphingolipids. To address this limitation, we developed a novel approach for quantitative sphingolipid analysis. This approach utilizes fragmentation models to correct for structural differences and thus overcomes the limitations associated with using a limited number of standards for quantification. Importantly, our method is independent of the internal standard, instrumental setup, and collision energy. Furthermore, we integrated this method into a user-friendly KNIME workflow. The validation results illustrate the effectiveness of our approach in accurately quantifying ceramide subclasses from various biological matrices. This breakthrough opens up new avenues for exploring sphingolipid metabolism and gaining insights into its implications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.