ArticleThe Journal of chemical physics2023
The role of structural heterogeneity in the homodimerization of transmembrane proteins.
Article in The Journal of chemical physics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- Structure and Dynamics of the HIV-1 Envelope Protein on the Virion Envelope.Journal of the American Chemical Society · 2026Article
- Accurate determination of the preferred aggregation number of a micelle-encapsulated membrane protein dimer.Biophysical journal · 2026Article
- Free energy of collagen-mimetic peptide dimerization and implications for fibrillization.Biophysical journal · 2026Article
- Bridging Scales: Coarse-Grained Protein Models in Computational Biology.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2026Review
- Structural Heterogeneity of the Membrane-Interacting Region of the HIV-1 Envelope Glycoprotein.Journal of the American Chemical Society · 2025Article
- Bottom-up Coarse-Grained Models of Asymmetric Membranes.The journal of physical chemistry. B · 2025Article
- Machine Learning Derived Collective Variables for the Study of Protein Homodimerization in Membrane.Journal of chemical theory and computation · 2024Article
- A Rigorous Framework for Calculating Protein-Protein Binding Affinities in Membranes.Journal of chemical theory and computation · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
The equilibrium association of transmembrane proteins plays a fundamental role in membrane protein function and cellular signaling. While the study of the equilibrium binding of single pass transmembrane proteins has received significant attention in experiment and simulation, the accurate assessment of equilibrium association constants remains a challenge to experiment and simulation. In experiment, there remain wide variations in association constants derived from experimental studies of the most widely studied transmembrane proteins. In simulation, state-of-the art methods have failed to adequately sample the thermodynamically relevant structures of the dimer state ensembles using coarse-grained models. In addition, all-atom force fields often fail to accurately assess the relative free energies of the dimer and monomer states. Given the importance of this fundamental biophysical process, it is essential to address these shortcomings. In this work, we establish an effective computational protocol for the calculation of equilibrium association constants for transmembrane homodimer formation. A set of transmembrane protein homodimers, used in the parameterization of the MARTINI v3 force field, are simulated using metadynamics, based on three collective variables. The method is found to be accurate and computationally efficient, providing a standard to be used in the future simulation studies using coarse-grained or all-atom models.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.