Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37782241›Full record

ArticleJournal of applied clinical medical physics2023

Development of machine learning model to predict pulmonary function with low-dose CT-derived parameter response mapping in a community-based chest screening cohort.

Xiuxiu Zhou, Yu Pu, Di Zhang, Yu Guan, Yang Lu, Weidong Zhang, Chi-Cheng Fu, Qu Fang, Hanxiao Zhang, Shiyuan Liu and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of applied clinical medical physics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Xiuxiu ZhouDepartment of Radiology, Second Affiliated Hospital of PLA Naval Medical University, Shanghai, China.
Yu PuDepartment of Radiology, Second Affiliated Hospital of PLA Naval Medical University, Shanghai, China.
Di ZhangDepartment of Radiology, Second Affiliated Hospital of PLA Naval Medical University, Shanghai, China.
Yu GuanDepartment of Radiology, Second Affiliated Hospital of PLA Naval Medical University, Shanghai, China.
Yang LuShanghai Aitrox Technology Corporation Limited, Shanghai, China.
Weidong ZhangShanghai Aitrox Technology Corporation Limited, Shanghai, China.
Chi-Cheng FuShanghai Aitrox Technology Corporation Limited, Shanghai, China.
Qu FangShanghai Aitrox Technology Corporation Limited, Shanghai, China.
Hanxiao ZhangDepartment of Radiology, Second Affiliated Hospital of PLA Naval Medical University, Shanghai, China.
Shiyuan LiuDepartment of Radiology, Second Affiliated Hospital of PLA Naval Medical University, Shanghai, China.
Li FanDepartment of Radiology, Second Affiliated Hospital of PLA Naval Medical University, Shanghai, China.
Shanghai Changzheng Hospital · CNChina Aerospace Science and Technology Corporation · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo construct and evaluate the performance of a machine learning-based low dose computed tomography (LDCT)-derived parametric response mapping (PRM) model for predicting pulmonary function test (PFT) results. MATERIALS AND

methodsA total of 615 subjects from a community-based screening population (40-74 years old) with PFT parameters, including the ratio of the first second forced expiratory volume to forced vital capacity (FEV1/FVC), the percentage of forced expiratory volume in the one second predicted (FEV1%), and registered inspiration-to-expiration chest CT scanning were enrolled retrospectively. Subjects were classified into a normal, high risk, and COPD group based on PFT. Data of 72 PRM-derived quantitative parameters were collected, including volume and volume percentage of emphysema, functional-small airways disease, and normal lung tissue. A machine-learning with random forest regression model and a multilayer perceptron (MLP) model were constructed and tested on PFT prediction, which was followed by evaluation of classification performance based on the PFT predictions.

resultsThe machine-learning model based on PRM parameters showed better performance for predicting PFT than MLP, with a coefficient of determination (R

conclusionsThe machine learning-based random forest model predicts PFT results in a community screening population based on PRM, and it identifies high risk COPD from normal populations with high sensitivity and reliably predicts of high-risk COPD.

Indexed as

LungPulmonary Disease, Chronic ObstructiveAdultAgedForced Expiratory VolumeHumansMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesTomography, X-Ray Computedchronic obstructivepulmonary diseasepulmonary function testquantitative imagingtomographyX-ray computed

Identifiers

PMID37782241
PMCPMC10647993
OpenAlexW4387241262

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.