Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37781656›Full record

ArticleThe journal of allergy and clinical immunology. Global2023

ABX464 (obefazimod) for patients with COVID-19 at risk for severe disease: miR-AGE, a randomized, double-blind placebo-controlled trial.

Pedro Giavina-Bianchi, Eric Cua, Karine Risso, Véronique Mondain, Anaïs Vissian, Cécile Joie, Philippe Pouletty, Paul Gineste, Hartmut J Ehrlich, Jorge Kalil

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The journal of allergy and clinical immunology. Global, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 30% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Drug Development in Inflammatory Bowel Diseases: What Is Next?Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Review
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Pedro Giavina-BianchiClinical Immunology and Allergy Division, Clinical Medicine Department, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo (FMUSP), Brazil.
Eric CuaCHU de Nice - Hôpital Archet 1, Nice, France.
Karine RissoCHU de Nice - Hôpital Archet 1, Nice, France.
Véronique MondainCHU de Nice - Hôpital Archet 1, Nice, France.
Anaïs VissianAbivax, Paris, France.
Cécile JoieAbivax, Paris, France.
Philippe PoulettyAbivax, Paris, France.
Paul GinesteAbivax, Paris, France.
Hartmut J EhrlichAbivax, Paris, France.
Jorge KalilClinical Immunology and Allergy Division, Clinical Medicine Department, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo (FMUSP), Brazil.
Abivax (France) · FRCentre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nice · FRHospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: ABX464 (obefazimod) is a small molecule that upregulates a single microRNA (miR-124) in immune cells and reduces the production of various inflammatory cytokines and chemokines. Objective: We assessed the efficacy and safety of the standard of care (SoC) plus oral obefazimod (SoC plus ABX464), 50 mg once daily, versus the SoC plus placebo for prevention of severe acute respiratory syndrome in patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) who are at risk for severe disease. Methods: Eligible patients for this phase 2/3 double-blind, placebo-controlled miR-AGE study were randomized (2:1) into 2 groups: SoC-ABX464 (n = 339) and SoC-placebo (n = 170). The primary end point was the percentage of patients who did not require use of high-flow oxygen or invasive or noninvasive mechanical ventilation within 28 days. The safety analyses included patients who had been randomly assigned and had received at least 1 dose of the study treatment. Results: At the time of the interim analysis, obefazimod showed no benefit over placebo when added to the SoC; the study enrollment was stopped for futility. The evaluation of the safety of obefazimod in 505 patients showed significantly more treatment-emergent adverse events in the SoC-ABX464 group than in the SoC-placebo group ( Conclusion: For patients who have severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection and are at risk for severe COVID-19, obefazimod, 50 mg, provided no benefit over placebo when added to the SoC, although it did have a good safety profile (comparable to that reported in many therapeutic areas).

Indexed as

ABX464COVID-19miR-124obefazimod

Identifiers

PMID37781656
PMCPMC10509999
OpenAlexW4383107278

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.