Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37781537›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology2023

Perfect prosthetic heart valve: generative design with machine learning, modeling, and optimization.

Viacheslav V Danilov, Kirill Y Klyshnikov, Pavel S Onishenko, Alex Proutski, Yuriy Gankin, Farid Melgani, Evgeny A Ovcharenko

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Viacheslav V DanilovPolitecnico di Milano, Milan, Italy.
Kirill Y KlyshnikovResearch Institute for Complex Issues of Cardiovascular Diseases, Kemerovo, Russia.
Pavel S OnishenkoResearch Institute for Complex Issues of Cardiovascular Diseases, Kemerovo, Russia.
Alex ProutskiQuantori, Cambridge, MA, United States.
Yuriy GankinQuantori, Cambridge, MA, United States.
Farid MelganiUniversity of Trento, Trento, Italy.
Evgeny A OvcharenkoResearch Institute for Complex Issues of Cardiovascular Diseases, Kemerovo, Russia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Majority of modern techniques for creating and optimizing the geometry of medical devices are based on a combination of computer-aided designs and the utility of the finite element method This approach, however, is limited by the number of geometries that can be investigated and by the time required for design optimization. To address this issue, we propose a generative design approach that combines machine learning (ML) methods and optimization algorithms. We evaluate eight different machine learning methods, including decision tree-based and boosting algorithms, neural networks, and ensembles. For optimal design, we investigate six state-of-the-art optimization algorithms, including Random Search, Tree-structured Parzen Estimator, CMA-ES-based algorithm, Nondominated Sorting Genetic Algorithm, Multiobjective Tree-structured Parzen Estimator, and Quasi-Monte Carlo Algorithm. In our study, we apply the proposed approach to study the generative design of a prosthetic heart valve (PHV). The design constraints of the prosthetic heart valve, including spatial requirements, materials, and manufacturing methods, are used as inputs, and the proposed approach produces a final design and a corresponding score to determine if the design is effective. Extensive testing leads to the conclusion that utilizing a combination of ensemble methods in conjunction with a Tree-structured Parzen Estimator or a Nondominated Sorting Genetic Algorithm is the most effective method in generating new designs with a relatively low error rate. Specifically, the Mean Absolute Percentage Error was found to be 11.8% and 10.2% for lumen and peak stress prediction respectively. Furthermore, it was observed that both optimization techniques result in design scores of approximately 95%. From both a scientific and applied perspective, this approach aims to select the most efficient geometry with given input parameters, which can then be prototyped and used for subsequent

Indexed as

computer-aided designfinite element methodgenerative designgradient methodsheart valve prosthesismachine learningoptimizationprosthetic heart valve

Identifiers

PMID37781537
PMCPMC10541217

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.