Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37781492›Full record

ArticleActa informatica medica : AIM : journal of the Society for Medical Informatics of Bosnia & Herzegovina : casopis Drustva za medicinsku informatiku BiH2023

Electronic On-line Incident Reporting System (IRS) as a Tool for Risk Assessment in Radiation Therapy.

Muhamed Topcagic, Fuad Julardzija, Arzija Pasalic, Adnan Sehic, Adnan Beganovic, Hasan Osmic, Enis Tinjak, Adnan Huskic

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Acta informatica medica : AIM : journal of the Society for Medical Informatics of Bosnia & Herzegovina : casopis Drustva za medicinsku informatiku BiH, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 70% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Muhamed TopcagicClinic of Oncology and Radiation Therapy, University Clinical Center Tuzla, Tuzla, Bosnia & Herzegovina.
Fuad JulardzijaFaculty of Health Studies, University of Sarajevo, Sarajevo, Bosnia & Herzegovina.
Arzija PasalicFaculty of Health Studies, University of Sarajevo, Sarajevo, Bosnia & Herzegovina.
Adnan SehicFaculty of Health Studies, University of Sarajevo, Sarajevo, Bosnia & Herzegovina.
Adnan BeganovicClinic of Oncology, University Clinical Center Sarajevo, Sarajevo, Bosnia & Herzegovina.
Hasan OsmicClinic of Oncology and Radiation Therapy, University Clinical Center Tuzla, Tuzla, Bosnia & Herzegovina.
Enis TinjakClinic of Oncology, University Clinical Center Sarajevo, Sarajevo, Bosnia & Herzegovina.
Adnan HuskicClinic of Oncology and Radiation Therapy, University Clinical Center Tuzla, Tuzla, Bosnia & Herzegovina.
University of Sarajevo · BAUniversity Clinical Center Tuzla · BA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Radiotherapy is one of the primary treatment options in cancer management, together with surgery and chemotherapy. Radiation therapy is technologically complex discipline involving professionals with various specialties, and using high energy radiation in treatment of wide range of different cancer types. Technical complexity, increasing number of patients, large workload, and delivery of radiation therapy treatment with lack of human, technical and financial resources in low and middle income countries creates environment with great potential to develop incidents. Emerging need of modern radiation therapy is to develop preventive approach to risk management i to improve the patient safety. Objective: The objective of this research is to identify and assess risk associated with radiation therapy practice in Bosnia and Herzegovina. Methods: An anonymous, voluntary electronic on-line radiation therapy incident reporting system (IRS) was created. IRS consists of four sections containing questions about working environment, incident occurrence, root causes and contributing factors, and incident severity assessment. Data collected using IRS were used to create taxonomy of incidents in radiation therapy. Risk assessment was made using Risk Matrix method. Research was made using the data collected from first 60 incidents reported to IRS. Results: Based on probability and frequency of incident occurrence and severity of consequences, it was assessed that 41.7% of incidents had low risk level (L), 50% of incidents had moderate risk level (M), and 8.3% of incidents had high risk level (H). Radiation therapy risk profile based on risk assessment results clearly shows that incidents with low frequency, low occurrence probability, but high consequences severity level have highest level of risk. Conclusion: The results of this research confirm that the electronic on-line radiation therapy IRS allows the identification and classification of the most significant risk factors in radiotherapy and prevention of serious incidents occurrence.

Indexed as

IncidentRadiation TherapyRisk AssessmentRisk MatrixSafety

Identifiers

PMID37781492
PMCPMC10540742
OpenAlexW4386812006

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.