ReviewDiabetology international2023
Lost in translation: assessing the nomenclature change for diabetic kidney disease in Japan.
Review in Diabetology international, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Recently in Japan, the term "tonyobyo sei jinzobyo", the Japanese translation of "diabetic kidney disease", has been increasingly used in place of the term "tonyobyo sei jinsho", the Japanese translation of "diabetic nephropathy". Many international diabetes and nephrology guidelines have defined diabetic kidney disease as a condition caused by diabetes, typically presenting with albuminuria, similar to or identical to current and historical definitions for diabetic nephropathy. However, recent guidelines from the Japanese Society of Nephrology propose a broader disease concept for the term diabetic kidney disease, including patients without albuminuria. A rationale for proposing a broader disease concept for diabetic kidney disease may have come from changes in the kidney phenotype of patients with diabetes observed in recent years. Epidemiological studies have shown that an increasing proportion of patients with diabetes have reduced kidney function, while the prevalence of those with albuminuria appears to have decreased. However, these studies also suggested that the more advanced age of patients presenting with diabetes and increased use of renin-angiotensin system blockers may have contributed to this change in disease phenotype. We believe the principal rationale for the nomenclature change from diabetic nephropathy to diabetic kidney disease was to create a more easily understood, lay-language term for English speakers, rather than to create a term to encompass a broader population of diabetes with chronic kidney disease (CKD). Further discussion and international consensus are needed for the definition of diabetic kidney disease, to avoid ambiguity or possible confusion.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.