ArticleFrontiers in cardiovascular medicine2023
Predictive capacity of a genetic risk score for coronary artery disease in assessing recurrences and cardiovascular mortality among patients with myocardial infarction.
Article in Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Sex-stratified polygenic risk scores for coronary artery disease incidence: Insights from a 20-year cohort study.BMC cardiovascular disorders · 2026Article
- The Genetic Risk Score with Variants in PDGFs and PDGFRB for the Risk of Major Cardiovascular Adverse Events in Patients with Coronary Artery Disease.Journal of atherosclerosis and thrombosis · 2025Article
- Interplay between lifestyle factors and polygenic risk for incident coronary heart disease in a large multiethnic cohort.International journal of cardiology. Cardiovascular risk and prevention · 2024Article
- Polygenic risk and incident coronary heart disease in a large multiethnic cohort.American journal of preventive cardiology · 2024Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Aim: This study aimed to evaluate the capacity of a genetic risk score (GRS) for coronary artery disease (CAD) independent of classical cardiovascular risk factors to assess the risk of recurrence in patients with first myocardial infarction. The secondary aim was to determine the predictive value of this GRS. Methods: We performed a meta-analysis of individual data from three studies, namely, a prospective study including 75 patients aged <55 years, a prospective study including 184 patients with a mean age of 60.5 years, and a case-control study (77 cases and 160 controls) nested in a cohort of patients with first myocardial infarction. A GRS including 12 CAD genetic variants independent of classical cardiovascular risk factors was developed. The outcome was a composite of cardiovascular mortality and recurrent acute coronary syndrome. Results: The GRS was associated with a higher risk of recurrence [hazard ratio = 1.24; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.04-1.47]. The inclusion of the GRS in the clinical model did not increase the model's discriminative capacity (change in C-statistic/area under the curve: 0.009; 95% CI: -0.007 to 0.025) but improved its reclassification (continuous net reclassification index: 0.29; 95% CI: 0.08-0.51). Conclusion: The GRS for CAD, independent of classical cardiovascular risk factors, was associated with a higher risk of recurrence in patients with first myocardial infarction. The predictive capacity of this GRS identified a subgroup of high-risk patients who could benefit from intensive preventive strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.