Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37781300›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in cardiovascular medicine2023

Clinical characteristics and risk factors of in-hospital mortality among patients undergoing percutaneous pericardiocentesis.

Maciej T Wybraniec, Zofia Kampka, Mateusz Drabczyk, Marek Zielonka, Przemysław Urbaniec, Grzegorz Wypych, Małgorzata Cichoń, Tomasz Szatan, Paweł Jastrzębski, Katarzyna Mizia-Stec

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Maciej T WybraniecFirst Department of Cardiology, School of Medicine in Katowice, Medical University of Silesia, Katowice, Poland.
Zofia KampkaFirst Department of Cardiology, School of Medicine in Katowice, Medical University of Silesia, Katowice, Poland.
Mateusz DrabczykFirst Department of Cardiology, School of Medicine in Katowice, Medical University of Silesia, Katowice, Poland.
Marek ZielonkaFirst Department of Cardiology, School of Medicine in Katowice, Medical University of Silesia, Katowice, Poland.
Przemysław UrbaniecFirst Department of Cardiology, School of Medicine in Katowice, Medical University of Silesia, Katowice, Poland.
Grzegorz WypychFirst Department of Cardiology, School of Medicine in Katowice, Medical University of Silesia, Katowice, Poland.
Małgorzata CichońFirst Department of Cardiology, School of Medicine in Katowice, Medical University of Silesia, Katowice, Poland.
Tomasz SzatanDepartment of Cardiology in Cieszyn, Upper-Silesian Medical Centre, Cieszyn, Poland.
Paweł JastrzębskiDepartment of Cardiology in Cieszyn, Upper-Silesian Medical Centre, Cieszyn, Poland.
Katarzyna Mizia-StecFirst Department of Cardiology, School of Medicine in Katowice, Medical University of Silesia, Katowice, Poland.
Medical University of Silesia · PLERN GUARD-Heart · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Percutaneous pericardiocentesis represents a salvage procedure in case of cardiac tamponade and diagnostic procedure in chronic pericardial effusion of unknown source. The study aimed to analyze the clinical characteristics of patients subject to pericardiocentesis and the predictors of in-hospital mortality. Methods: The study represents a registry that covered consecutive patients undergoing percutaneous pericardiocentesis from 2011 to 2022 in high-volume tertiary reference center. Electronic health records were queried to obtain demographic and clinical variables. The primary endpoint was in-hospital mortality, while secondary endpoint was the need for recurrent pericardiocentesis. Results: Out of 132 456 patients hospitalized in the prespecified period, 247 patients were subject to percutaneous pericardiocentesis (53.9% women; median age of 66 years) who underwent 273 procedures. In-hospital death was reported in 14 patients (5.67%), while recurrent pericardiocentesis in 24 patients (9.72%). Iatrogenic cause was the most common etiology (42.5%), followed by neoplastic disease (23.1%) and idiopathic effusion (14.57%). In logistic regression analysis in-hospital mortality was associated with myocardial infarction (MI)-related etiology ( Conclusions: Iatrogenic etiology and neoplastic disease seem to be the most common indications for pericardiocentesis, while in-hospital mortality was particularly high in patients with spontaneous tamponade in the course of MI.

Indexed as

cardiac tamponadein-hospital mortalitypericardiocentesispericarditisregistry

Identifiers

PMID37781300
PMCPMC10537933
OpenAlexW4386743239

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.