Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37781263›Full record

ArticleThe journal of allergy and clinical immunology. Global2022

Standardized testing and written communication improve patient understanding of beta-lactam allergy testing outcomes: A multicenter, prospective study.

Jacqueline Loprete, Constance H Katelaris, Louise Evans, Alisa Kane, Brendan McMullan, Brynn Wainstein, Melanie Wong, Jeffrey Post, Daniel Suan, Sanjay Swaminathan and 8 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The journal of allergy and clinical immunology. Global, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 31% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Delabeling, safety, and impact of β-lactam allergy testing: A systematic review.The journal of allergy and clinical immunology. Global · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors at 9 institutions in 1 country.

Jacqueline LopreteImmunology and HIV Unit, St Vincent's Hospital, Sydney, Australia.
Constance H KatelarisCampbelltown Hospital, Western Sydney University, Campbelltown, Australia.
Louise EvansLiverpool Hospital, Liverpool, Australia.
Alisa KaneImmunology and HIV Unit, St Vincent's Hospital, Sydney, Australia.
Brendan McMullanSydney Children's Hospital, Randwick, Australia.
Brynn WainsteinSydney Children's Hospital, Randwick, Australia.
Melanie WongChildren's Hospital Westmead, Westmead, Australia.
Jeffrey PostSt Vincent's Clinical Campus, School of Clinical Medicine, UNSW Medicine & Health, Sydney, Australia.
Daniel SuanSt Vincent's Clinical Campus, School of Clinical Medicine, UNSW Medicine & Health, Sydney, Australia.
Sanjay SwaminathanSchool of Medicine, Western Sydney University, Campbelltown, Australia.
Robyn RichardsonSt Vincent's Centre for Applied Medical Research, St Vincent's Hospital, Sydney, Australia.
Jamie RogersSt Vincent's Centre for Applied Medical Research, St Vincent's Hospital, Sydney, Australia.
Adrienne TordaSt Vincent's Clinical Campus, School of Clinical Medicine, UNSW Medicine & Health, Sydney, Australia.
Dianne E CampbellChildren's Hospital Westmead, Westmead, Australia.
Anthony D KelleherImmunology and HIV Unit, St Vincent's Hospital, Sydney, Australia.
Matthew LawKirby Institute, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia.
Andrew CarrImmunology and HIV Unit, St Vincent's Hospital, Sydney, Australia.
Winnie W Y TongImmunology and HIV Unit, St Vincent's Hospital, Sydney, Australia.
St Vincent's Hospital Melbourne · AUCamden and Campbelltown Hospitals · AULiverpool Hospital · AUPrince of Wales Hospital · AUSt Vincent's Clinic · AUSt Vincent's Hospital Sydney · AUThe University of Sydney · AUUNSW Sydney · AUWestmead Hospital · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Historical penicillin allergy is commonly reported, but the lack of standardized allergy clinic practices may diminish the ability to delabel beta-lactam allergy appropriately. Objective: We sought to improve beta-lactam allergy testing and patient understanding of their antibiotic allergy status by standardizing testing and communication practices between 7 adult and pediatric hospital centers. Methods: Phase 1 prospectively described the beta-lactam allergy testing practices at each center. Following this, practice was standardized to achieve a defined panel of skin testing reagents, pro forma result letters for patients and referring doctors, and provision of medical alert jewelry to those with confirmed allergy. Testing outcomes and patient perception regarding allergy status 8 weeks postassessment were compared before (phase 1) and after standardization (phase 2). Primary outcomes were the percentage of participants delabeled after testing, and concordance rates between participant perception of their allergy status and their status as determined by the treating physician at 8-week follow-up. Results: Of 195 adult and pediatric participants (median age, 50 years; 21.5% <18 years; 36.9% males), 75% were delabeled of their beta-lactam allergy. No patient experienced anaphylaxis related to any beta-lactam delabeling testing. In phase 1, 75% of participants received written results, 52% were informed verbally, and 48% received results in more than 1 form. All phase 2 participants received written results ( Conclusions: Standardization of testing and written patient information improved short-term patient perception of beta-lactam allergy status.

Indexed as

Beta-lactam allergydrug allergydrug allergy testing

Identifiers

PMID37781263
PMCPMC10509847
OpenAlexW4281721630

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.