Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37781178›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in oncology2023

Oral squamous cell carcinoma - do we always need elective neck dissection? evaluation of clinicopathological factors of greatest prognostic significance: a cross-sectional observational study.

Adam Michcik, Adam Polcyn, Maciej Sikora, Tomasz Wach, Łukasz Garbacewicz, Barbara Drogoszewska

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in oncology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
4.0field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Adam MichcikDepartment of Maxillofacial Surgery, Medical University of Gdansk, Gdańsk, Poland.
Adam PolcynDepartment of Maxillofacial Surgery, Medical University of Gdansk, Gdańsk, Poland.
Maciej SikoraDepartment of Maxillofacial Surgery, Hospital of the Ministry Interior, Kielce, Poland.
Tomasz WachDepartment of Maxillofacial Surgery, Medical University of Łódź, Łódź, Poland.
Łukasz GarbacewiczDepartment of Maxillofacial Surgery, Medical University of Gdansk, Gdańsk, Poland.
Barbara DrogoszewskaDepartment of Maxillofacial Surgery, Medical University of Gdansk, Gdańsk, Poland.
Gdańsk Medical University · PLMedical University of Lodz · PL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The aim of the study was to find clinical and pathological factors with the greatest prognostic significance in patients with OSCC. The analysis included 125 patients grouped according to the tumor primary site (TPS): the floor of the mouth (FOM), tongue (TC) and retromolar triangle (RMT). Grading (G), tumor size (pT), nodal metastases (NM), local recurrence (LR), nodal recurrence (NR), perineural invasion (PNI), lymphovascular invasion (LVI), extranodal extension (pENE), and nodal yield (NY) were evaluated in each group. Results: With regard to TPS, FOM appeared to be the most metastatic. However, the recurrence rate was similar to TC tumors, which were characterized by higher G than those in other locations. When analyzing G, the highest percentage of LR (40.5%) and NM (34.5%) was observed among patients with G2. As G increased, so did the number of pENE G1 - 7.4%; G2 - 31%; G3 - 35.7%; LVI: G1 - 25.9%; G2 - 50%; G3 - 57.1%; PNI: G1 - 29.6%; G2 - 47.6%; G3 - 92.9%; NR G1 - 14.8%; G2 - 32.1%; G3 - 21.4%. Grading did not affect the type of growth and did not directly affect the occurrence of NR. pT and DOI increased the frequency of NM but we did not observe any effect of pT and DOI on LR, PNI, and LVI. NY in the study group did not increase the risk of NR. Conclusion: Tumor primary sites within the FOM, TC, and pT classification are the factors that increase the risk of NM and LR. However, apart from the primary site predisposing to the occurrence of NM, the histological structure of the tumor turned out to be the most important feature affecting the patient's prognosis. The number of cases of pENE+, LVI+, PNI+, NM+, and NR+ increased with the increase in G. Although the pT, DOI increased the frequency of NM, we did not observe the effect of the pT and DOI on LR, PNI and LVI. Thus, even in the case of a small tumor of the FOM and TC with at least G2, elective neck dissection should be performed each time.

Indexed as

depth of invasionelective neck dissectionfloor of the mouthgradingoral squamus cell carcinomaprognostic factorstongue cancer

Identifiers

PMID37781178
PMCPMC10539602
OpenAlexW4386727702

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.